Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that cross-cultural supervision can be prone to microaggressions with deleterious effects for ethno-racial minorities. There are currently no known studies examining the impact of racial microaggressions in supervision on qualified psychologists. This study aimed to explore Black psychologists\' experiences of microaggressions in supervision with a White supervisor and their impact.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 individuals who had completed clinical or counselling psychology doctoral training. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
RESULTS: Three superordinate themes and 12 subthemes were derived from the analysis. The superordinate themes were: \'It\'s the subtle things\', \'It\'s an ordeal\' and \'Surviving Whiteness in psychology\'. The findings illustrate the complex nature of racial microaggressions and their profound and lasting impact on individuals. The cumulative impact of these experiences resulted in significant negative psychological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there are common microaggressions that recur in supervision. Encountering microaggressions impeded the supervisory relationship, supervision and professional development. Clinical implications include recommendations for including multicultural competency in psychology trainings and ongoing professional development plans.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 individuals who had completed clinical or counselling psychology doctoral training. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
RESULTS: Three superordinate themes and 12 subthemes were derived from the analysis. The superordinate themes were: \'It\'s the subtle things\', \'It\'s an ordeal\' and \'Surviving Whiteness in psychology\'. The findings illustrate the complex nature of racial microaggressions and their profound and lasting impact on individuals. The cumulative impact of these experiences resulted in significant negative psychological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there are common microaggressions that recur in supervision. Encountering microaggressions impeded the supervisory relationship, supervision and professional development. Clinical implications include recommendations for including multicultural competency in psychology trainings and ongoing professional development plans.
摘要：
目的：研究表明，跨文化监督可能容易产生对种族少数群体有害影响的微侵害。目前尚无已知的研究来研究种族微侵略对合格心理学家的监督的影响。这项研究旨在探索黑人心理学家在白人主管的监督中微攻击的经验及其影响。
方法：对10名完成临床或咨询心理学博士培训的人进行了半结构化访谈。使用解释现象学分析对访谈进行转录和分析。
结果：从分析中得出了三个上级主题和12个子主题。上级的主题是：“这是微妙的事情”，\“这是一场磨难\”和\“在心理学中生存白度\”。研究结果表明，种族微侵略的复杂性及其对个人的深远和持久的影响。这些经历的累积影响导致了显著的负面心理结果。
结论：结果表明，在监督中，有常见的微侵袭复发。遇到微观攻击阻碍了监督关系，监督和专业发展。临床意义包括在心理学培训和正在进行的专业发展计划中包括多元文化能力的建议。
方法：对10名完成临床或咨询心理学博士培训的人进行了半结构化访谈。使用解释现象学分析对访谈进行转录和分析。
结果：从分析中得出了三个上级主题和12个子主题。上级的主题是：“这是微妙的事情”，\“这是一场磨难\”和\“在心理学中生存白度\”。研究结果表明，种族微侵略的复杂性及其对个人的深远和持久的影响。这些经历的累积影响导致了显著的负面心理结果。
结论：结果表明，在监督中，有常见的微侵袭复发。遇到微观攻击阻碍了监督关系，监督和专业发展。临床意义包括在心理学培训和正在进行的专业发展计划中包括多元文化能力的建议。
