PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: There is a consensus hidden in the criminal legislation of many countries that the criminal responsibility capacity of juvenile offenders is not significantly different from that of their peers. The purpose of this paper was to test this hypothesis. The research objects of this paper were 187 juvenile offenders in J Province, China, who are under detention measures, and 2,449 students from junior high school, senior high school and university in S Province as comparison objects. We subjected the gathered materials to independent-samples t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
UNASSIGNED: (1) The self-control ability (109.30, 123.59) and empathy ability (63.86, 72.45) of juvenile offenders were significantly different from those of ordinary minors, but the difference of dialectical thinking ability was not statistically significant; (2) Except for the influence of mother\'s education level and family income on dialectical thinking ability, the other variables had no statistical significance on the three kinds of ability. Therefore, it was suggested that the correction plan and means for juvenile offenders should focus on the improvement of self-control ability and empathy ability.
UNASSIGNED: (1) The self-control ability (109.30, 123.59) and empathy ability (63.86, 72.45) of juvenile offenders were significantly different from those of ordinary minors, but the difference of dialectical thinking ability was not statistically significant; (2) Except for the influence of mother\'s education level and family income on dialectical thinking ability, the other variables had no statistical significance on the three kinds of ability. Therefore, it was suggested that the correction plan and means for juvenile offenders should focus on the improvement of self-control ability and empathy ability.
摘要：
■许多国家的刑事立法中隐藏着一个共识，即未成年犯的刑事责任能力与同龄人没有显着差异。本文的目的是检验这一假设。本文的研究对象是J省187名未成年犯,中国,被拘留的人，和2449名初中学生，以S省的高中和大学为比较对象。我们对收集的材料进行独立样本t检验和单向方差分析(ANOVA)。
■(1)少年犯的自我控制能力(109.30,123.59)和移情能力(63.86,72.45)与普通未成年人有显著差异,辩证思维能力差异无统计学意义;(2)除了母亲的文化程度和家庭收入对辩证思维能力的影响,其他变量对三种能力无统计学意义。因此,有人建议，少年犯的矫正计划和手段应侧重于自我控制能力和移情能力的提高。
■(1)少年犯的自我控制能力(109.30,123.59)和移情能力(63.86,72.45)与普通未成年人有显著差异,辩证思维能力差异无统计学意义;(2)除了母亲的文化程度和家庭收入对辩证思维能力的影响,其他变量对三种能力无统计学意义。因此,有人建议，少年犯的矫正计划和手段应侧重于自我控制能力和移情能力的提高。
