Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Use of video in patient education is becoming widespread due to its low cost, time management, ease of application, and permanent learning. The study aimed to investigate the effect of video training on the symptom burden, comfort level, and quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.
METHODS: In this clustered randomized controlled trial, the patients were randomly assigned to groups by lottery method according to hemodialysis treatment days and sessions. Individuals in the intervention group(n = 26) were screened one episode of the training video in each session for three episodes per week for 12 weeks. Individuals in the control group(n = 22) received only conventional hemodialysis without video training.
RESULTS: At the third and fourth measurement times, in intervention group, mean scores of symptom burden decreased compared to baseline (respectively:40,12 ± 21,63; 22,31 ± 14,08;21,54 ± 16,78), mean scores of comfort level increased (respectively:102,42 ± 13,45; 111,42 ± 8,00;115,04 ± 9,73)(p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in control group(p > 0.05). This study observed a statistically significant difference between quality of life scale scores individuals in intervention group(p < 0,05).
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that video training delivered to patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment decreased symptom burden of patients and increased their comfort level, and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Video training can be utilized in the educational program of hemodialysis patients.
METHODS: In this clustered randomized controlled trial, the patients were randomly assigned to groups by lottery method according to hemodialysis treatment days and sessions. Individuals in the intervention group(n = 26) were screened one episode of the training video in each session for three episodes per week for 12 weeks. Individuals in the control group(n = 22) received only conventional hemodialysis without video training.
RESULTS: At the third and fourth measurement times, in intervention group, mean scores of symptom burden decreased compared to baseline (respectively:40,12 ± 21,63; 22,31 ± 14,08;21,54 ± 16,78), mean scores of comfort level increased (respectively:102,42 ± 13,45; 111,42 ± 8,00;115,04 ± 9,73)(p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in control group(p > 0.05). This study observed a statistically significant difference between quality of life scale scores individuals in intervention group(p < 0,05).
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that video training delivered to patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment decreased symptom burden of patients and increased their comfort level, and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Video training can be utilized in the educational program of hemodialysis patients.
摘要：
目的：由于其低成本，在患者教育中使用视频变得越来越普遍，时间管理,易于应用，和永久的学习。本研究旨在探讨视频训练对症状负担的影响,舒适度,和接受血液透析治疗的患者的生活质量。
方法：在这项成组的随机对照试验中，根据血液透析治疗天数和疗程，采用抽签法将患者随机分组。干预组(n=26)的个体在每个疗程中筛选一个训练视频片段,每周三次,持续12周。对照组（n=22）仅接受常规血液透析而没有视频培训。
结果：在第三和第四测量时间，在干预组中，与基线相比，症状负担的平均得分降低（分别为：40,12±21,63;22,31±14,08;21,54±16,78），舒适度平均得分增加(分别为:102,42±13,45;111,42±8,00;115,04±9,73)(p<0.05),对照组差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。本研究观察到干预组个体生活质量量表得分之间的统计学差异（p<0.05）。
结论：结论：对接受血液透析治疗的患者进行视频培训可以减轻患者的症状负担，提高患者的舒适度。和生活质量。
结论：视频培训可用于血液透析患者的教育计划。
方法：在这项成组的随机对照试验中，根据血液透析治疗天数和疗程，采用抽签法将患者随机分组。干预组(n=26)的个体在每个疗程中筛选一个训练视频片段,每周三次,持续12周。对照组（n=22）仅接受常规血液透析而没有视频培训。
结果：在第三和第四测量时间，在干预组中，与基线相比，症状负担的平均得分降低（分别为：40,12±21,63;22,31±14,08;21,54±16,78），舒适度平均得分增加(分别为:102,42±13,45;111,42±8,00;115,04±9,73)(p<0.05),对照组差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。本研究观察到干预组个体生活质量量表得分之间的统计学差异（p<0.05）。
结论：结论：对接受血液透析治疗的患者进行视频培训可以减轻患者的症状负担，提高患者的舒适度。和生活质量。
结论：视频培训可用于血液透析患者的教育计划。
