METHODS: This study conducted a literature search limited to English articles. Three search strategies were used, and references were managed in Covidence software. Four investigators screened and evaluated articles independently, excluding meta-analyses, clinical trial protocols, and nonrelevant studies. Eligible studies, focused on clinical outcomes and stent patencies, underwent thorough review.
RESULTS: The literature search yielded 1704 studies, with 147 meeting eligibility criteria after screening and evaluation. Exclusions were based on duplicates, irrelevant content, and noniliac vein stent placement.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful IVS for CIVO relies on meticulous patient selection, consistent use of intravascular ultrasound examination during procedures and attention to the technical details of IVS.
方法:本研究仅针对英文文章进行文献检索。采用了三种搜索策略,和参考文献在Covidence软件中管理。四名研究者独立筛选和评估文章,不包括荟萃分析,临床试验方案,和无关的研究。符合条件的研究,专注于临床结果和支架通畅,进行了彻底的审查。
结果:文献检索产生了1,704项研究,在筛选和评估后,147人符合资格标准。排除基于重复项,无关内容,非髂静脉支架置入术。
结论:成功的IVS对于CIVO依赖于细致的患者选择,在手术过程中持续使用IVUS,并注意IVS的技术细节。