关键词: Bite mark Clinical forensic medicine Odontology Saliva

Mesh : Humans Bites, Human / pathology Forensic Dentistry / legislation & jurisprudence Expert Testimony / legislation & jurisprudence

来  源:   DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102689

Abstract:
Much has been written about bite mark comparisons and bite mark analysis. It has largely been written for, and remained within the domain of, the forensic odontologist despite the limited number of such specialists and the even smaller subset who have expertise in this area. For those health professionals who work in the field of clinical forensic medicine, most will not have access to a forensic odontologist. Courts can be reticent about the costs involved in obtaining another expert opinion. For health professionals, who will likely encounter more bite marks in their career than forensic odontologists, the difficulty is knowing what can legitimately be opined about such injuries.
摘要:
关于咬痕比较和咬痕分析的文章很多。它基本上是为,并保留在的范围内,法医牙科医生,尽管这类专家数量有限,在这一领域拥有专业知识的子集甚至更少。对于那些在临床法医学领域工作的卫生专业人员,大多数人都找不到法医牙科医生.法院可以对获得其他专家意见所涉及的费用保持沉默。对于卫生专业人员来说,他们在职业生涯中可能会遇到比法医牙科医生更多的咬痕,困难在于知道如何合理地看待这种伤害。
公众号