METHODS: One hundred consecutive ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention discharged from Middlemore Hospital and without atrial fibrillation in the first quarter of 2023 were studied. ANZACS-QI ischaemic (I) and bleeding (B) risk scores were calculated, with patients categorised in four groups based on ESC recommendations-low I/low B risk, low I/high B, high I/low B and high I/high B. Guideline and clinician recommended duration of DAPT and prescription of PPI were compared.
RESULTS: All patients were planned for DAPT at discharge and 91% a PPI. Up to four out of five ACS patients could have been planned for shorter DAPT durations based on the ESC guideline recommendations. Over half of included patients (53%) had a high bleeding risk, yet 85% of these patients received 12 months of DAPT despite ESC recommendations of 1-3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a divergence between clinical practice and the recommendations of the 2020 ESC guidelines. We discuss these results in relation to the updated August 2023 ESC guidelines, which have reaffirmed a 12-month duration of DAPT as the default position.
方法:研究了2023年第一季度从Middlemore医院出院且无房颤的100例连续接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ACS患者。计算ANZACS-QI缺血(I)和出血(B)风险评分,根据ESC建议将患者分为四组-低I/低B风险,低I/高B,比较高I/低B和高I/高B指南和临床医生推荐的DAPT持续时间和PPI处方。
结果:所有患者均计划在出院时进行DAPT,91%aPPI。根据ESC指南建议,可能有多达五分之四的ACS患者计划缩短DAPT持续时间。超过一半的患者(53%)有较高的出血风险,尽管ESC建议接受1~3个月的DAPT,但仍有85%的患者接受了12个月的DAPT.
结论:临床实践与2020年ESC指南的建议之间存在差异。我们将讨论这些结果与2023年8月更新的ESC指南有关,他们重申了12个月的DAPT作为默认头寸。