RESULTS: At baseline, seven ce-MRI detected lesions were also detected with 18F-FACBC with high SUVs and TBRs (SUVmax:mean, 4.73, TBRmax: mean, 9.32, SUVpeak: mean, 3.21, TBRpeak:mean: 6.30). High TBR values of 18F-FACBC detected lesions were attributed to low SUVbackground. Baseline 18F-FDG detected six lesions with high SUVs (SUVmax: mean, 13.88). In response scans, two lesions were detected with ce-MRI, while only one was detected with 18F-FACBC. The lesion not detected with 18F-FACBC was a small atypical MRI detected lesion, which may indicate no residual disease, as this patient was still in complete remission 12 months after initial diagnosis. No lesions were detected with 18F-FDG in the response scans.
CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FACBC provided high tumor contrast, outperforming 18F-FDG in lesion detection at both baseline and in response assessment. 18F-FACBC may be a useful supplement to ce-MRI in PCNSL detection and response assessment, but further studies are required to validate these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 15th of June 2017 (Identifier: NCT03188354, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03188354 ).
结果:在基线时,用18F-FACBC在高SUV和TBR的情况下也检测到7个ce-MRI检测到的病变(SUVmax:平均值,4.73,TBRmax:平均值,9.32,SUVpeak:平均,3.21,TBRpeak:平均值:6.30)。18F-FACBC检测到的病变的高TBR值归因于低SUVbackground。基线18F-FDG检测到6个高SUV病变(SUVmax:平均值,13.88)。在响应扫描中,CE-MRI检测到两个病变,而18F-FACBC仅检测到一种。18F-FACBC未检测到的病变是一个小的不典型MRI检测到的病变,这可能表明没有残留疾病,因为该患者在初次诊断后12个月仍处于完全缓解状态。在响应扫描中使用18F-FDG未检测到病变。
结论:18F-FACBC提供了较高的肿瘤对比度,在基线和反应评估中,病变检测优于18F-FDG。18F-FACBC在PCNSL检测和反应评估中可能是CE-MRI的有用补充,但需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。审判登记ClinicalTrials.gov.2017年6月15日注册(标识符:NCT03188354,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03188354)。