PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Although there is growing attention to research translation, dissemination practices remain underdeveloped. This study aimed to gain insights into the dissemination approaches, barriers for dissemination, and needs for dissemination support of public health researchers of the Amsterdam Public Health (APH) research institute.
UNASSIGNED: A concurrent mixed-methods design was used, collecting quantitative and qualitative data through a survey and qualitative data from interviews. Researchers of the Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases (HBCD) research line of APH were approached via email with a link to an online survey. For the interviews, we aimed to balance researchers in terms of career phase and position. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis.
UNASSIGNED: HBCD researchers primarily rely on traditional approaches for dissemination, e.g. academic journals (93%), conferences (93%), and reports to funders (71%). Social media (67%) was also frequently mentioned. Dissemination is often prioritized late due to time constraints and competing priorities. Researchers mentioned a lack of time, money, knowledge, and skills but also limited awareness of available support as barriers. A need for more resources, education, and a shift in mindset was expressed, suggesting a comprehensive inspiring platform and stronger in-house connections as solutions.
UNASSIGNED: HBCD researchers emphasized the importance of dedicated time and budget for dissemination, as well as other forms of institutional support. Overall, there is a need for a shift in mindset, more educational initiatives, greater integration of dissemination into researchers\' roles, the establishment of a comprehensive inspiring platform, and stronger in-house connections to support dissemination efforts.
UNASSIGNED: A concurrent mixed-methods design was used, collecting quantitative and qualitative data through a survey and qualitative data from interviews. Researchers of the Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases (HBCD) research line of APH were approached via email with a link to an online survey. For the interviews, we aimed to balance researchers in terms of career phase and position. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis.
UNASSIGNED: HBCD researchers primarily rely on traditional approaches for dissemination, e.g. academic journals (93%), conferences (93%), and reports to funders (71%). Social media (67%) was also frequently mentioned. Dissemination is often prioritized late due to time constraints and competing priorities. Researchers mentioned a lack of time, money, knowledge, and skills but also limited awareness of available support as barriers. A need for more resources, education, and a shift in mindset was expressed, suggesting a comprehensive inspiring platform and stronger in-house connections as solutions.
UNASSIGNED: HBCD researchers emphasized the importance of dedicated time and budget for dissemination, as well as other forms of institutional support. Overall, there is a need for a shift in mindset, more educational initiatives, greater integration of dissemination into researchers\' roles, the establishment of a comprehensive inspiring platform, and stronger in-house connections to support dissemination efforts.
摘要：
■尽管研究翻译越来越受到重视，传播实践仍然不发达。这项研究旨在深入了解传播方式，传播的障碍，并需要阿姆斯特丹公共卫生（APH）研究所的公共卫生研究人员的传播支持。
■采用了并行混合方法设计，通过调查收集定量和定性数据，并从访谈中收集定性数据。通过电子邮件与APH的健康行为和慢性疾病（HBCD）研究系列的研究人员联系，并链接到在线调查。对于采访，我们的目标是在职业阶段和职位方面平衡研究人员。通过描述性统计和主题内容分析对数据进行分析。
■六溴环十二烷研究人员主要依靠传统的传播方式，例如学术期刊（93%），会议（93%），并向资助者报告(71%)。社交媒体（67%）也经常被提及。由于时间限制和相互竞争的优先顺序，传播通常会推迟。研究人员提到缺乏时间，钱，知识,和技能，但也限制了对可用支持的认识。需要更多的资源，教育,表达了心态的转变，建议一个全面的鼓舞人心的平台和更强大的内部连接作为解决方案。
■六溴环十二烷的研究人员强调了专门用于传播的时间和预算的重要性，以及其他形式的机构支持。总的来说,有必要转变心态，更多的教育举措，将传播更多地整合到研究人员的角色中，建立一个全面的鼓舞人心的平台，加强内部联系，以支持传播工作。
■采用了并行混合方法设计，通过调查收集定量和定性数据，并从访谈中收集定性数据。通过电子邮件与APH的健康行为和慢性疾病（HBCD）研究系列的研究人员联系，并链接到在线调查。对于采访，我们的目标是在职业阶段和职位方面平衡研究人员。通过描述性统计和主题内容分析对数据进行分析。
■六溴环十二烷研究人员主要依靠传统的传播方式，例如学术期刊（93%），会议（93%），并向资助者报告(71%)。社交媒体（67%）也经常被提及。由于时间限制和相互竞争的优先顺序，传播通常会推迟。研究人员提到缺乏时间，钱，知识,和技能，但也限制了对可用支持的认识。需要更多的资源，教育,表达了心态的转变，建议一个全面的鼓舞人心的平台和更强大的内部连接作为解决方案。
■六溴环十二烷的研究人员强调了专门用于传播的时间和预算的重要性，以及其他形式的机构支持。总的来说,有必要转变心态，更多的教育举措，将传播更多地整合到研究人员的角色中，建立一个全面的鼓舞人心的平台，加强内部联系，以支持传播工作。
