Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To examine the utility of a novel sexual risk index (SRI) to better use National College Health Assessment (NCHA) sexual health-related questions.
UNASSIGNED: The first phase included discussions, testing, and recoding of the initial set of items. In the second phase, a correlation analysis was run; items were systematically removed to achieve a Cronbach\'s alpha of .714.
UNASSIGNED: All currently enrolled students in Spring 2020 at medium-sized, 4-year public university in Florida were recruited (n = 4,850) for the NCHA. Of the 441 total respondents, 223 students were included in the SRI analyses. Most had very low SRI scores, indicating few sexual risks. Nontraditional students were half as likely to experience academic challenges as compared to traditional students (TS; OR = .487, p = .033), while increasing SRI scores (OR = 1.182, p = .022) and decreasing GPA scores (OR = -1.975, p < .001) were associated with an increased likelihood of self-reporting academic challenges.
UNASSIGNED: Results suggest high utility and reliability of the SRI. The use of the SRI provides a better overall picture of sexual risk-taking through a score rather than comparison of individual NCHA items.
UNASSIGNED: The first phase included discussions, testing, and recoding of the initial set of items. In the second phase, a correlation analysis was run; items were systematically removed to achieve a Cronbach\'s alpha of .714.
UNASSIGNED: All currently enrolled students in Spring 2020 at medium-sized, 4-year public university in Florida were recruited (n = 4,850) for the NCHA. Of the 441 total respondents, 223 students were included in the SRI analyses. Most had very low SRI scores, indicating few sexual risks. Nontraditional students were half as likely to experience academic challenges as compared to traditional students (TS; OR = .487, p = .033), while increasing SRI scores (OR = 1.182, p = .022) and decreasing GPA scores (OR = -1.975, p < .001) were associated with an increased likelihood of self-reporting academic challenges.
UNASSIGNED: Results suggest high utility and reliability of the SRI. The use of the SRI provides a better overall picture of sexual risk-taking through a score rather than comparison of individual NCHA items.
摘要：
■检查新型性风险指数（SRI）的实用性，以更好地使用国家大学健康评估（NCHA）性健康相关问题。
■第一阶段包括讨论，测试,并重新编码最初的一组项目。在第二阶段,进行了相关分析；系统地删除了项目，以实现Cronbachα为.714。
■所有目前在2020年春季注册的中等规模学生，佛罗里达州的4年制公立大学被NCHA招募（n=4,850）。在441名受访者中，223名学生被纳入SRI分析。大多数人的SRI得分非常低，表明性风险很小。与传统学生相比，非传统学生经历学术挑战的可能性是传统学生的一半(TS;OR=.487，p=.033)，而SRI得分增加(OR=1.182,p=.022)和GPA得分降低(OR=-1.975,p<.001)与自我报告学术挑战的可能性增加相关.
■结果表明SRI的实用性和可靠性很高。SRI的使用通过评分而不是比较单个NCHA项目提供了更好的性冒险总体情况。
■第一阶段包括讨论，测试,并重新编码最初的一组项目。在第二阶段,进行了相关分析；系统地删除了项目，以实现Cronbachα为.714。
■所有目前在2020年春季注册的中等规模学生，佛罗里达州的4年制公立大学被NCHA招募（n=4,850）。在441名受访者中，223名学生被纳入SRI分析。大多数人的SRI得分非常低，表明性风险很小。与传统学生相比，非传统学生经历学术挑战的可能性是传统学生的一半(TS;OR=.487，p=.033)，而SRI得分增加(OR=1.182,p=.022)和GPA得分降低(OR=-1.975,p<.001)与自我报告学术挑战的可能性增加相关.
■结果表明SRI的实用性和可靠性很高。SRI的使用通过评分而不是比较单个NCHA项目提供了更好的性冒险总体情况。
