PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The strain on workers of the healthcare system and education sector increased psychological distress and burnout. This study aimed to distinguish the occupational group that is the most affected by occupational burnout and to reveal the scope of psychosocial risk factors among each occupational group.
This is a cross-sectional study that analyzed burnout syndrome among 1,046 participants of different occupational groups in association with psychosocial work environment factors in Lithuania. The anonymous questionnaire was composed of the standardized Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). To find out associations between psychosocial work environment factors and burnout dimensions, a multiple logistic regression model using the stepwise method was applied.
The burnout levels in all three dimensions (personal, work-related, and client-related burnout) were significantly higher in physicians\' and nurses\' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers (p < 0.05). The job demands were associated with the personal burnout subscale for all occupations, except public health specialists - each one-unit increase of this variable significantly increased the probability of personal burnout from 10 to 16%, respectively by the occupation. Co-worker support was found to have a buffering effect for all occupational groups, except managers - and significantly reduced personal burnout for physicians (OR = 0.80), nurses (OR = 0.75), public health specialists (OR = 0.75), and teachers (OR = 0.79).
The burnout levels in all three dimensions differed between occupational groups: there were significantly higher in physicians\' and nurses\' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers. Considering the occupational preventive measures in the healthcare sector attention should be paid to the reduction of workload and ensuring good relations between co-workers.
This is a cross-sectional study that analyzed burnout syndrome among 1,046 participants of different occupational groups in association with psychosocial work environment factors in Lithuania. The anonymous questionnaire was composed of the standardized Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). To find out associations between psychosocial work environment factors and burnout dimensions, a multiple logistic regression model using the stepwise method was applied.
The burnout levels in all three dimensions (personal, work-related, and client-related burnout) were significantly higher in physicians\' and nurses\' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers (p < 0.05). The job demands were associated with the personal burnout subscale for all occupations, except public health specialists - each one-unit increase of this variable significantly increased the probability of personal burnout from 10 to 16%, respectively by the occupation. Co-worker support was found to have a buffering effect for all occupational groups, except managers - and significantly reduced personal burnout for physicians (OR = 0.80), nurses (OR = 0.75), public health specialists (OR = 0.75), and teachers (OR = 0.79).
The burnout levels in all three dimensions differed between occupational groups: there were significantly higher in physicians\' and nurses\' groups compared with public health professionals, teachers, and managers. Considering the occupational preventive measures in the healthcare sector attention should be paid to the reduction of workload and ensuring good relations between co-workers.
摘要：
医疗保健系统和教育部门的工作人员的压力增加了心理困扰和倦怠。本研究旨在区分受职业倦怠影响最大的职业群体，揭示各职业群体中心理社会危险因素的范围。
这是一项横断面研究，分析了立陶宛1,046名不同职业群体的参与者中与心理社会工作环境因素相关的倦怠综合征。匿名问卷由标准化工作内容问卷(JCQ)组成，和哥本哈根职业倦怠清单(CBI)。找出心理社会工作环境因素与职业倦怠维度之间的关联，采用逐步法建立多元逻辑回归模型.
所有三个维度的倦怠水平(个人，工作相关,和客户相关的倦怠)在医生和护士组中明显高于公共卫生专业人员，教师,和管理人员(p<0.05)。工作需求与所有职业的个人倦怠量表相关，除了公共卫生专家-这个变量的每一个单位的增加显着增加了个人倦怠的概率从10％到16％，分别由占领。发现同事支持对所有职业群体都有缓冲作用，除了管理人员-并且显著降低了医生的个人倦怠(OR=0.80)，护士（OR=0.75），公共卫生专家（OR=0.75），和教师（OR=0.79）。
职业组的所有三个维度的倦怠水平均不同：与公共卫生专业人员相比，医生和护士组的倦怠水平明显更高，教师,和经理。考虑到医疗保健部门的职业预防措施，应注意减少工作量并确保同事之间的良好关系。
这是一项横断面研究，分析了立陶宛1,046名不同职业群体的参与者中与心理社会工作环境因素相关的倦怠综合征。匿名问卷由标准化工作内容问卷(JCQ)组成，和哥本哈根职业倦怠清单(CBI)。找出心理社会工作环境因素与职业倦怠维度之间的关联，采用逐步法建立多元逻辑回归模型.
所有三个维度的倦怠水平(个人，工作相关,和客户相关的倦怠)在医生和护士组中明显高于公共卫生专业人员，教师,和管理人员(p<0.05)。工作需求与所有职业的个人倦怠量表相关，除了公共卫生专家-这个变量的每一个单位的增加显着增加了个人倦怠的概率从10％到16％，分别由占领。发现同事支持对所有职业群体都有缓冲作用，除了管理人员-并且显著降低了医生的个人倦怠(OR=0.80)，护士（OR=0.75），公共卫生专家（OR=0.75），和教师（OR=0.79）。
职业组的所有三个维度的倦怠水平均不同：与公共卫生专业人员相比，医生和护士组的倦怠水平明显更高，教师,和经理。考虑到医疗保健部门的职业预防措施，应注意减少工作量并确保同事之间的良好关系。
