PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Questionnaires designed to test knowledge and self-perception can be valuable tools for diagnosing a dentist\'s understanding of the management and administration of a practice. The objective of this study was to create and authenticate a questionnaire for assessing dentists\' self-perception on oral healthcare management developed from discussions with experts in this field.
METHODS: In order to create and verify a questionnaire survey, a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was carried out. Participants\' personal information and 31 statements across four categories made up the final questionnaire form. The answers to the questionnaire were in the form of a Likert scale. After refining the initial version, a total of 36 interviews were conducted at dental offices to verify the validity. For the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), we used the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index, the Bartlett sphericity test, and also Cronbach alpha coefficient for the validity of the questionnaire.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the instrument was measured by intrarater and interrater reliability. For the EFA, all the communalities exceeded the threshold of 0.05. With a Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient of 0.898, the questionnaire has sufficient internal consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire demonstrates robust reliability and validity, thereby affirming its suitability for its intended purpose.
METHODS: In order to create and verify a questionnaire survey, a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was carried out. Participants\' personal information and 31 statements across four categories made up the final questionnaire form. The answers to the questionnaire were in the form of a Likert scale. After refining the initial version, a total of 36 interviews were conducted at dental offices to verify the validity. For the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), we used the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index, the Bartlett sphericity test, and also Cronbach alpha coefficient for the validity of the questionnaire.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the instrument was measured by intrarater and interrater reliability. For the EFA, all the communalities exceeded the threshold of 0.05. With a Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient of 0.898, the questionnaire has sufficient internal consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire demonstrates robust reliability and validity, thereby affirming its suitability for its intended purpose.
摘要：
目的：旨在测试知识和自我感知的问卷可能是诊断牙医对实践管理和管理的理解的有价值的工具。这项研究的目的是创建并验证一份问卷，用于评估牙医对口腔保健管理的自我感知，该问卷是通过与该领域专家的讨论而开发的。
方法：为了创建和验证问卷调查，横截面，描述性,描述性并进行了分析研究。参与者的个人信息和四个类别的31个陈述构成了最终的调查表。问卷的答案是李克特量表的形式。在完善了初始版本之后，在牙科诊所共进行了36次访谈，以验证有效性。对于探索性因子分析(EFA)，我们使用了Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)指数，巴特利特球形度测试,以及问卷有效性的Cronbachα系数。
结果：通过内部和评估者的可靠性来测量仪器的准确性。对于全民教育，所有社区都超过了0.05的阈值。Cronbach的α系数为0.898,问卷具有足够的内在一致性。
结论：问卷显示出稳健的信度和效度，从而确认其对预期目的的适用性。
方法：为了创建和验证问卷调查，横截面，描述性,描述性并进行了分析研究。参与者的个人信息和四个类别的31个陈述构成了最终的调查表。问卷的答案是李克特量表的形式。在完善了初始版本之后，在牙科诊所共进行了36次访谈，以验证有效性。对于探索性因子分析(EFA)，我们使用了Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)指数，巴特利特球形度测试,以及问卷有效性的Cronbachα系数。
结果：通过内部和评估者的可靠性来测量仪器的准确性。对于全民教育，所有社区都超过了0.05的阈值。Cronbach的α系数为0.898,问卷具有足够的内在一致性。
结论：问卷显示出稳健的信度和效度，从而确认其对预期目的的适用性。
