PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Although abundant evidence has confirmed cyberbullying as a global online risk, little is known about the coping strategies employed by victims and those who experiencing bullying. A validated scale for coping with cyberbullying could inform evidence-based social services and enable comparative studies of this phenomenon among victims from different backgrounds. This study aims to validate the Coping Strategies for Victims of Cyberbullying (CSVC) scale among Chinese adolescents and to compare its effectiveness between victims and bully-victims (individuals with dual roles).
METHODS: A 25-item CSVC scale was translated and adapted for cultural relevance in the Chinese context. A sample of 1,716 adolescents, aged 13-18 years, from two middle schools and one high school in China, was recruited. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted.
RESULTS: The EFA revealed that the Chinese version of the CSVC scale had satisfactory validity. The CFA demonstrated a good fit for the eight-factor model in assessing different coping strategies for cyberbullying. Differences in the selection of coping strategies were observed between the general adolescent population and sexual and gender minorities.
CONCLUSIONS: Future intervention studies may use this validated scale to educate adolescents, both those affected by cyberbullying and those who are not, to learn a broader range of coping strategies and to choose more effective ones.
METHODS: A 25-item CSVC scale was translated and adapted for cultural relevance in the Chinese context. A sample of 1,716 adolescents, aged 13-18 years, from two middle schools and one high school in China, was recruited. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted.
RESULTS: The EFA revealed that the Chinese version of the CSVC scale had satisfactory validity. The CFA demonstrated a good fit for the eight-factor model in assessing different coping strategies for cyberbullying. Differences in the selection of coping strategies were observed between the general adolescent population and sexual and gender minorities.
CONCLUSIONS: Future intervention studies may use this validated scale to educate adolescents, both those affected by cyberbullying and those who are not, to learn a broader range of coping strategies and to choose more effective ones.
摘要：
背景：尽管大量证据已经证实网络欺凌是一种全球性的在线风险，对受害者和遭受欺凌的人采用的应对策略知之甚少。经过验证的应对网络欺凌的量表可以为基于证据的社会服务提供信息，并能够对来自不同背景的受害者之间的这一现象进行比较研究。本研究旨在验证中国青少年网络欺凌受害者应对策略（CSVC）量表，并比较其在受害者和欺凌受害者（具有双重角色的个人）之间的有效性。
方法：翻译并调整了25个项目的CSVC量表，以适应中国语境中的文化相关性。1716名青少年的样本，13-18岁,来自中国的两所中学和一所高中，被招募。同时进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。
结果：EFA显示CSVC量表中文版具有令人满意的效度。CFA在评估网络欺凌的不同应对策略时很适合八因素模型。在一般青少年人口与性和性别少数群体之间观察到应对策略选择的差异。
结论：未来的干预研究可能会使用这种经过验证的量表来教育青少年，受网络欺凌影响的人和不受影响的人，学习更广泛的应对策略并选择更有效的策略。
方法：翻译并调整了25个项目的CSVC量表，以适应中国语境中的文化相关性。1716名青少年的样本，13-18岁,来自中国的两所中学和一所高中，被招募。同时进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。
结果：EFA显示CSVC量表中文版具有令人满意的效度。CFA在评估网络欺凌的不同应对策略时很适合八因素模型。在一般青少年人口与性和性别少数群体之间观察到应对策略选择的差异。
结论：未来的干预研究可能会使用这种经过验证的量表来教育青少年，受网络欺凌影响的人和不受影响的人，学习更广泛的应对策略并选择更有效的策略。
