METHODS: This scoping review protocol follows the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data will be collected and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews report. The search strategy will include publications from the databases Scopus, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, in addition to a search in grey literature in The National Library of Australia\'s Trobe, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Electronic Theses Online Service, Theses Canada, Google Scholar and Theses and dissertations from Latin America. Data extraction will include data on general information, study characteristics, organisations involved, sociodemographic context, implementation strategies, indicators of implementation process, frameworks used to design or evaluate the strategy, implementation outcomes and final considerations. Critical analysis of implementation strategies and outcomes will be performed with researchers with experience implementing the WHO SCC.
BACKGROUND: The study does not require an ethical review due to its design as a scoping review of the literature. The results will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and all relevant data from this study will be made available in Dataverse.
BACKGROUND: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RWY27.
方法:本范围审查方案遵循JoannaBriggs研究所的指南。数据将根据系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查报告的Meta分析扩展进行收集和报告。搜索策略将包括来自数据库Scopus的出版物,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL和WebofScience,除了在澳大利亚国家图书馆搜索灰色文献之外,DART-Europe电子主题门户,电子论文在线服务,加拿大,来自拉丁美洲的谷歌学者和论文和论文。数据提取将包括一般信息数据,研究特点,参与组织,社会人口统计背景,实施战略,实施过程的指标,用于设计或评估策略的框架,实施结果和最终考虑因素。将与具有实施WHOSCC经验的研究人员一起对实施策略和结果进行批判性分析。
背景:由于将其设计为文献的范围审查,因此该研究不需要进行伦理审查。结果将提交给科学期刊发表,这项研究的所有相关数据将在Dataverse中提供。
背景:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/RWY27。