PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Paediatricians perform medical assessments for children in cases of suspected child maltreatment. Due to their role with statutory child protection agencies and police, paediatricians may be asked to testify in court about child protection and criminal justice matters. To the authors\' knowledge, there has been no previous systematic review of the literature synthesising the evidence on the impacts on paediatricians testifying in cases of child maltreatment.
METHODS: A search strategy comprising indexed and key terms will be applied to six electronic reference databases from inception to May 2023: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full-text articles against predefined eligibility criteria to identify studies of interest. Conflicts will be independently adjudicated by a third reviewer.
BACKGROUND: Since the systematic review methodology aims at synthesising information from available publications, this study does not require ethical approval. An article reporting the results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a scientific journal, presented at relevant conferences and used in subsequent stakeholder consultations.
METHODS: A search strategy comprising indexed and key terms will be applied to six electronic reference databases from inception to May 2023: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full-text articles against predefined eligibility criteria to identify studies of interest. Conflicts will be independently adjudicated by a third reviewer.
BACKGROUND: Since the systematic review methodology aims at synthesising information from available publications, this study does not require ethical approval. An article reporting the results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a scientific journal, presented at relevant conferences and used in subsequent stakeholder consultations.
摘要：
背景：儿科医生在怀疑儿童虐待的情况下对儿童进行医学评估。由于他们在法定儿童保护机构和警察中的作用，儿科医生可能会被要求在法庭上就儿童保护和刑事司法问题作证。就作者所知，以前没有对文献进行系统的综述，这些文献综合了有关虐待儿童对儿科医生的影响的证据。
方法：从开始到2023年5月，将对六个电子参考数据库应用包含索引和关键术语的搜索策略：Medline，EMBASE,PsycINFO,CINAHL,刑事司法文摘和Cochrane图书馆。两名审稿人将根据预定义的资格标准独立筛选标题和摘要以及全文文章，以确定感兴趣的研究。冲突将由第三位审稿人独立裁决。
背景：由于系统审查方法旨在从现有出版物中综合信息，这项研究不需要伦理批准.一篇报告系统评价结果的文章将提交科学期刊发表，在相关会议上提出，并在随后的利益相关者磋商中使用。
方法：从开始到2023年5月，将对六个电子参考数据库应用包含索引和关键术语的搜索策略：Medline，EMBASE,PsycINFO,CINAHL,刑事司法文摘和Cochrane图书馆。两名审稿人将根据预定义的资格标准独立筛选标题和摘要以及全文文章，以确定感兴趣的研究。冲突将由第三位审稿人独立裁决。
背景：由于系统审查方法旨在从现有出版物中综合信息，这项研究不需要伦理批准.一篇报告系统评价结果的文章将提交科学期刊发表，在相关会议上提出，并在随后的利益相关者磋商中使用。
