METHODS: Research articles on DA rhinoplasty techniques were identified through a comprehensive literature search. Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were used as electronic databases. Each database was searched for articles published since its inception. DA rhinoplasty techniques were examined in this literature review. Methodological quality was assessed for the selected studies, and data was extracted to examine materials used, surgical approaches, and reported outcomes for each technique. Various DA methods, including autologous grafts and synthetic implants, are examined in-depth in this review. Comparing approaches can help better understand their respective advantages and limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: A wealth of techniques is available for DA rhinoplasty, each with advantages. Patients\' nasal anatomy, desired outcomes, and potential risks must be considered by surgeons when determining their surgical approach. DA methods continue to evolve rapidly, creating a need for a thorough understanding of the current landscape to make informed decisions.
方法:通过全面的文献检索确定了关于DA隆鼻技术的研究文章。Scopus,PubMed,和WebofScience被用作电子数据库。每个数据库都搜索了自成立以来发表的文章。本文献综述对DA隆鼻技术进行了研究。对所选研究的方法学质量进行了评估,并提取数据以检查所使用的材料,手术方法,并报告了每种技术的结果。各种DA方法,包括自体移植和合成植入物,在这篇综述中进行了深入的研究。比较方法可以帮助更好地理解它们各自的优点和局限性。
结论:DA隆鼻技术丰富,每个人都有优势。患者鼻腔解剖,期望的结果,和潜在的风险必须由外科医生在确定他们的手术方法时考虑。DA方法继续快速发展,创造了对当前景观的透彻了解以做出明智的决定的需要。