关键词: Driving pressure Failure General anesthesia Lung aeration score Lung ultrasound Lung ultrasound score Lung-protective ventilation Mechanical ventilation Obesity PEEP Positive end-expiratory pressure Postoperative pulmonary complications

Mesh : Humans Positive-Pressure Respiration / methods adverse effects Anesthesia, General / adverse effects Body Mass Index Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Postoperative Complications / prevention & control etiology Tidal Volume Lung / physiopathology Treatment Outcome

来  源:   DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08107-8   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In patients requiring general anesthesia, lung-protective ventilation can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications, which are associated with higher morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is one component of lung-protective ventilation. The correct strategy for setting adequate PEEP, however, remains controversial. PEEP settings that lead to a lower pressure difference between end-inspiratory plateau pressure and end-expiratory pressure (\"driving pressure,\" ΔP) may reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Preliminary data suggests that the PEEP required to prevent both end-inspiratory overdistension and end-expiratory alveolar collapse, thereby reducing ΔP, correlates positively with the body mass index (BMI) of patients, with PEEP values corresponding to approximately 1/3 of patient\'s respective BMI. Thus, we hypothesize that adjusting PEEP according to patient BMI reduces ΔP and may result in less postoperative pulmonary complications.
METHODS: Patients undergoing general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 7 ml per kg predicted body weight will be randomized and assigned to either an intervention group with PEEP adjusted according to BMI or a control group with a standardized PEEP of 5 mbar. Pre- and postoperatively, lung ultrasound will be performed to determine the lung aeration score, and hemodynamic and respiratory vital signs will be recorded for subsequent evaluation. The primary outcome is the difference in ΔP as a surrogate parameter for lung-protective ventilation. Secondary outcomes include change in lung aeration score, intraoperative occurrence of hemodynamic and respiratory events, oxygen requirements and postoperative pulmonary complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results will show whether an intraoperative ventilation strategy with PEEP adjustment based on BMI has the potential of reducing the risk for postoperative pulmonary complications as an easy-to-implement intervention that does not require lengthy ventilator maneuvers nor additional equipment.
BACKGROUND: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00031336. Registered 21st February 2023.
METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Germany, on 1st February 2023. Recruitment began in March 2023 and is expected to end in September 2023.
摘要:
背景:在需要全身麻醉的患者中,肺保护性通气可以预防术后肺部并发症,这与更高的发病率有关,死亡率,并延长住院时间。呼气末正压(PEEP)的应用是肺保护性通气的一个组成部分。设定适当PEEP的正确策略,然而,仍然有争议。PEEP设置导致吸气末平台压力和呼气末压力之间的压力差降低(“驱动压力,\“ΔP)可以降低术后肺部并发症的风险。初步数据表明,PEEP需要防止吸气末扩张和呼气末肺泡塌陷,从而降低ΔP,与患者的体重指数(BMI)呈正相关,PEEP值对应于患者各自BMI的约1/3。因此,我们假设根据患者BMI调整PEEP可降低ΔP,并可减少术后肺部并发症.
方法:将接受全身麻醉和气管插管的患者进行容量控制通气,潮气量为7ml/kg预测体重,并随机分配给根据BMI调整PEEP的干预组或标准PEEP为5mbar的对照组。术前和术后,将进行肺超声检查以确定肺通气评分,血液动力学和呼吸生命体征将被记录用于后续评估。主要结果是ΔP作为肺保护性通气的替代参数的差异。次要结果包括肺通气评分的变化,术中血流动力学和呼吸事件的发生,氧需求和术后肺部并发症。
结论:研究结果将表明,基于BMI调整PEEP的术中通气策略是否具有降低术后肺部并发症风险的潜力,作为一种易于实施的干预措施,不需要长时间的呼吸机操作,也不需要额外的设备。
背景:德国临床试验注册(DRKS),DRKS00031336。2023年2月21日注册。
方法:研究方案得到了基尔基督教-阿尔布雷希茨大学伦理委员会的批准,德国,2023年2月1日招聘始于2023年3月,预计将于2023年9月结束。
公众号