PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Both knotted all suture anchors and metal anchors are used for arthroscopic Bankart repair. We retrospectively evaluated and compared clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the knotted all-suture anchors and knotted metal anchors.
UNASSIGNED: In a retrospective cohort analysis, patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair without any concomitant additional lesion repair using either all-suture anchors or metal anchors, between January 2015 and May 2018 were identified. Their pre- and post-operative functional and clinical outcomes were compared using Rowe and WOSI scores. The recurrence rate in the two groups was also compared.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 41 patients in all suture anchors group and 47 in the metal anchors group were identified as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. The demographic profile of both groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcome between the two suture anchor groups as per Rowe (pre-operative 40.13+6.51 vs 38.09+6.24 and post-operative 2 years 93.28+7.09 vs 92.55+9.2) and WOSI (pre-operative 943.05+216.64 vs 977.55+165.46 and post-operative 2 years 278.21+227.56 vs 270.94+186.25) scores. There was a significant improvement in both the groups between preoperative and post-operative ROWE and WOSI scores at 6 months and 2 years follow-up as compared to pre-operative scores (p<0.001). Re-dislocation rates were also comparable (4.8% vs 6.3%).
UNASSIGNED: All-suture anchors showed comparable clinical and functional results as the metal anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair at two-year follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: In a retrospective cohort analysis, patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair without any concomitant additional lesion repair using either all-suture anchors or metal anchors, between January 2015 and May 2018 were identified. Their pre- and post-operative functional and clinical outcomes were compared using Rowe and WOSI scores. The recurrence rate in the two groups was also compared.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 41 patients in all suture anchors group and 47 in the metal anchors group were identified as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. The demographic profile of both groups was comparable. There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcome between the two suture anchor groups as per Rowe (pre-operative 40.13+6.51 vs 38.09+6.24 and post-operative 2 years 93.28+7.09 vs 92.55+9.2) and WOSI (pre-operative 943.05+216.64 vs 977.55+165.46 and post-operative 2 years 278.21+227.56 vs 270.94+186.25) scores. There was a significant improvement in both the groups between preoperative and post-operative ROWE and WOSI scores at 6 months and 2 years follow-up as compared to pre-operative scores (p<0.001). Re-dislocation rates were also comparable (4.8% vs 6.3%).
UNASSIGNED: All-suture anchors showed comparable clinical and functional results as the metal anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair at two-year follow-up.
摘要：
■所有缝合锚和金属锚都用于关节镜Bankart修复。我们回顾性评估并比较了使用打结的全缝合锚钉和打结的金属锚钉进行关节镜Bankart修复后的临床和功能结果。
■在回顾性队列分析中，接受关节镜Bankart修复的患者，没有使用全缝合锚钉或金属锚钉进行任何伴随的额外病变修复，确定了2015年1月至2018年5月之间的数据。使用Rowe和WOSI评分比较他们的术前和术后功能和临床结果。比较两组的复发率。
■根据纳入和排除标准，所有缝合锚钉组共41例患者和金属锚钉组47例患者被确定。两组的人口统计学特征具有可比性。根据Rowe（术前40.13+6.51vs38.09+6.24和术后2年93.28+7.09vs92.55+9.2）和WOSI（术前943.05+216.64vs977.55+165.46和术后2年278.21+227.56vs270.94+186.25），两个缝合锚钉组之间的临床和功能结果没有显着差异。两组在术前和术后6个月和2年随访时的ROWE和WOSI评分与术前评分相比均有显著改善(p<0.001)。再脱位率也相当(4.8%vs6.3%)。
■在两年的随访中，所有缝合锚钉均显示出与用于关节镜Bankart修复的金属锚钉相当的临床和功能结果。
■在回顾性队列分析中，接受关节镜Bankart修复的患者，没有使用全缝合锚钉或金属锚钉进行任何伴随的额外病变修复，确定了2015年1月至2018年5月之间的数据。使用Rowe和WOSI评分比较他们的术前和术后功能和临床结果。比较两组的复发率。
■根据纳入和排除标准，所有缝合锚钉组共41例患者和金属锚钉组47例患者被确定。两组的人口统计学特征具有可比性。根据Rowe（术前40.13+6.51vs38.09+6.24和术后2年93.28+7.09vs92.55+9.2）和WOSI（术前943.05+216.64vs977.55+165.46和术后2年278.21+227.56vs270.94+186.25），两个缝合锚钉组之间的临床和功能结果没有显着差异。两组在术前和术后6个月和2年随访时的ROWE和WOSI评分与术前评分相比均有显著改善(p<0.001)。再脱位率也相当(4.8%vs6.3%)。
■在两年的随访中，所有缝合锚钉均显示出与用于关节镜Bankart修复的金属锚钉相当的临床和功能结果。
