METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted. All patients who had a single ulcer on dorsum of the tongue and confirmed diagnosis of PCM or OSCC were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 9 patients (5 women and 4 men) were evaluated, 5 patients had OSCCs (mean age = 69,8 years old), and 4 patients PCM (mean age = 51 years old). Most of the lesions were infiltrated and indurated in the palpation exam. Duration ranged from 1 to 12 months (mean time of 5.2 months and 4.7 months for OSCC and PCM, respectively). OSCC was the main clinical diagnosis hypothesis.
CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon, PCM and OSCC should be considered as a differential diagnosis hypothesis in infiltrated ulcers on the tongue dorsum. Incisional biopsy is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis and indicate the appropriate treatment.
方法:使用抗BRAFV600E抗体对总共86个成釉细胞瘤样本进行免疫组织化学检查。分析每例的组织病理学特征。
结果:65/86例(75.6%)检测到抗BRAFV600E抗体阳性。BRAFV600E在38/56例(67.9%)常规成釉细胞瘤和27/30例(90.0%)单囊性成釉细胞瘤中呈阳性。当比较单囊性成釉细胞瘤与常规成釉细胞瘤时,观察到BRAFV600E阳性的统计学显着差异(p=0.03)。当比较组织学变异时,观察到BRAFV600E阳性无统计学差异,常规成釉细胞瘤和单囊性成釉细胞瘤。
结论:这项研究强调了拉丁美洲成釉细胞瘤中BRAFV600E免疫反应性的高频率。BRAFV600E免疫表达的普遍性可能表明利用BRAF靶向治疗具有该突变的成釉细胞瘤的可行性。