Abstract：
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT, an AI-powered online chatbot, to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).
METHODS: Seven FAQs regarding SCFE were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and compared with evidence-based literature and reputable online resources. Responses were subjectively rated as \"excellent response requiring no further clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification,\" or \"unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification.\"
RESULTS: ChatGPT was frequently able to provide satisfactory responses that required only minimal clarification. One response received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT is able to frequently provide satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding SCFE while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.
METHODS: Seven FAQs regarding SCFE were presented to ChatGPT. Initial responses were recorded and compared with evidence-based literature and reputable online resources. Responses were subjectively rated as \"excellent response requiring no further clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification,\" or \"unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification.\"
RESULTS: ChatGPT was frequently able to provide satisfactory responses that required only minimal clarification. One response received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.
CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT is able to frequently provide satisfactory responses to FAQs regarding SCFE while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.
摘要：
背景：我们试图评估ChatGPT的能力，一个人工智能驱动的在线聊天机器人，回答常见问题解答（FAQ）有关滑脱股骨骨phy（SCFE）。
方法：向ChatGPT提交了关于SCFE的七个常见问题解答。记录初始反应，并与循证文献和信誉良好的在线资源进行比较。反应主观上被评为“极好的反应，不需要进一步澄清，“\”令人满意的响应需要最少的澄清，“\”令人满意的回应，需要适度澄清，“或”不令人满意的反应，需要大量澄清。\"
结果：ChatGPT通常能够提供令人满意的反应，只需要最少的澄清。一个答复得到了很好的评价，不需要进一步澄清，而ChatGPT仅有1项反应被评为不令人满意，需要进行实质性澄清。
结论：ChatGPT能够经常对有关SCFE的常见问题解答提供令人满意的回答，同时适当重申始终咨询医学专业人员的重要性。
方法：向ChatGPT提交了关于SCFE的七个常见问题解答。记录初始反应，并与循证文献和信誉良好的在线资源进行比较。反应主观上被评为“极好的反应，不需要进一步澄清，“\”令人满意的响应需要最少的澄清，“\”令人满意的回应，需要适度澄清，“或”不令人满意的反应，需要大量澄清。\"
结果：ChatGPT通常能够提供令人满意的反应，只需要最少的澄清。一个答复得到了很好的评价，不需要进一步澄清，而ChatGPT仅有1项反应被评为不令人满意，需要进行实质性澄清。
结论：ChatGPT能够经常对有关SCFE的常见问题解答提供令人满意的回答，同时适当重申始终咨询医学专业人员的重要性。
