PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate \"coronally advanced flap\" with or without \"a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the root coverage.\"
UNASSIGNED: All the clinical parameters were assessed at different time intervals (at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months) in both experimental and control group. Following \"clinical parameters\" were recorded using \"UNC-15\" \"Probe-Plaque Index (PI)\" (Silness and Loe, 1964), \"Gingival Index\" (GI) (Loe and Silness, 1963), \"Recession depth (RD),\" \"Recession width (RW),\" \"Clinical attachment level (CAL),\" and \"Width of keratinized gingiva (WKG)\".
UNASSIGNED: At final evaluation (i.e., mean change from baseline to 6 months), \"the decrease in Plaque Index was 2.5% higher in Group B (66.0%) as compared to Group A (63.5%). The decrease in Gingival Index was 6.1% higher in Group B (91.4%) as compared to Group A (85.3%), and the decrease in recession width was 4.0% higher in Group B (75.2%) as compared to Group A (71.2%). The decrease in clinical attachment level was 4.4% higher in Group B (53.2%) as compared to Group A (48.4%). The increase in width of keratinized gingiva was 1.9% higher in Group A (28.8%) as compared to Group B (26.9%).\"
UNASSIGNED: The controlled, randomized, split mouth design showed that CAF surgery, either by alone or in combination with PRF, is an efficient treatment method for covering denuded roots. \"This design was used to treat bilateral isolated Miller\'s class I and II recessions in gingival part. When compared to the CAF approach, the results from a combination of CAF and PRF after a 6-month period showed additional advantages in addition to mean root coverage in the treatment of Miller\'s classes I and II recessions in gingival part.\"
UNASSIGNED: All the clinical parameters were assessed at different time intervals (at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months) in both experimental and control group. Following \"clinical parameters\" were recorded using \"UNC-15\" \"Probe-Plaque Index (PI)\" (Silness and Loe, 1964), \"Gingival Index\" (GI) (Loe and Silness, 1963), \"Recession depth (RD),\" \"Recession width (RW),\" \"Clinical attachment level (CAL),\" and \"Width of keratinized gingiva (WKG)\".
UNASSIGNED: At final evaluation (i.e., mean change from baseline to 6 months), \"the decrease in Plaque Index was 2.5% higher in Group B (66.0%) as compared to Group A (63.5%). The decrease in Gingival Index was 6.1% higher in Group B (91.4%) as compared to Group A (85.3%), and the decrease in recession width was 4.0% higher in Group B (75.2%) as compared to Group A (71.2%). The decrease in clinical attachment level was 4.4% higher in Group B (53.2%) as compared to Group A (48.4%). The increase in width of keratinized gingiva was 1.9% higher in Group A (28.8%) as compared to Group B (26.9%).\"
UNASSIGNED: The controlled, randomized, split mouth design showed that CAF surgery, either by alone or in combination with PRF, is an efficient treatment method for covering denuded roots. \"This design was used to treat bilateral isolated Miller\'s class I and II recessions in gingival part. When compared to the CAF approach, the results from a combination of CAF and PRF after a 6-month period showed additional advantages in addition to mean root coverage in the treatment of Miller\'s classes I and II recessions in gingival part.\"
摘要：
■评估有或没有富含血小板的纤维蛋白膜的“冠状推进皮瓣”。\"
■在不同的时间间隔（在基线，1、3和6个月）在实验组和对照组中。使用“UNC-15”“探针-斑块指数（PI）”记录“临床参数”（SilnessandLoe，1964),“牙龈指数”(GI)(Loe和沉默，1963),“衰退深度（RD），\"\"衰退宽度(RW),\"\"临床依恋等级(CAL),\"和\"角化牙龈宽度(WKG)\"。
■在最终评估时(即，从基线到6个月的平均变化)，与A组(63.5%)相比，B组(66.0%)的斑块指数下降高出2.5%。与A组（85.3%）相比，B组（91.4%）的牙龈指数下降了6.1%，与A组（71.2％）相比，B组（75.2％）的凹陷宽度减少了4.0％。与A组（48.4％）相比，B组（53.2％）的临床依恋水平下降了4.4％。与B组（26.9％）相比，A组（28.8％）的角化牙龈宽度增加了1.9％。\"
■受控，随机化，分口设计显示CAF手术，单独或与PRF结合使用，是覆盖剥皮根的有效处理方法。“该设计用于治疗牙龈部分的双侧孤立Miller的I级和II级凹陷。与CAF方法相比，6个月后，CAF和PRF联合治疗的结果显示，在治疗Miller的牙龈部分I级和II级凹陷时，除了平均根覆盖率外，还有其他优势。\"
■在不同的时间间隔（在基线，1、3和6个月）在实验组和对照组中。使用“UNC-15”“探针-斑块指数（PI）”记录“临床参数”（SilnessandLoe，1964),“牙龈指数”(GI)(Loe和沉默，1963),“衰退深度（RD），\"\"衰退宽度(RW),\"\"临床依恋等级(CAL),\"和\"角化牙龈宽度(WKG)\"。
■在最终评估时(即，从基线到6个月的平均变化)，与A组(63.5%)相比，B组(66.0%)的斑块指数下降高出2.5%。与A组（85.3%）相比，B组（91.4%）的牙龈指数下降了6.1%，与A组（71.2％）相比，B组（75.2％）的凹陷宽度减少了4.0％。与A组（48.4％）相比，B组（53.2％）的临床依恋水平下降了4.4％。与B组（26.9％）相比，A组（28.8％）的角化牙龈宽度增加了1.9％。\"
■受控，随机化，分口设计显示CAF手术，单独或与PRF结合使用，是覆盖剥皮根的有效处理方法。“该设计用于治疗牙龈部分的双侧孤立Miller的I级和II级凹陷。与CAF方法相比，6个月后，CAF和PRF联合治疗的结果显示，在治疗Miller的牙龈部分I级和II级凹陷时，除了平均根覆盖率外，还有其他优势。\"
