PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Cardiac arrest research has not received as much scientific attention as research on other topics. Here, we aimed to identify cardiac arrest research barriers from the perspective of an international group of early career researchers.
UNASSIGNED: Attendees of the 2022 international masterclass on cardiac arrest registry research accompanied the Global Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry collaborative meeting in Utstein, Norway, and used an adapted hybrid nominal group technique to obtain a diverse and comprehensive perspective. Barriers were identified using a web-based questionnaire and discussed and ranked during an in-person follow-up meeting. After each response was discussed and clarified, barriers were categorized and ranked over two rounds. Each participant scored these from 1 (least significant) to 5 (most significant).
UNASSIGNED: Nine participants generated 36 responses, forming seven overall categories of cardiac arrest research barriers. \"Allocated research time\" was ranked first in both rounds. \"Scientific environment\", including appropriate mentorship and support systems, ranked second in the final ranking. \"Resources\", including funding and infrastructure, ranked third. \"Access to and availability of cardiac arrest research data\" was the fourth-ranked barrier. This included data from the cardiac arrest registries, medical devices, and clinical studies. Finally, \"uniqueness\" was the fifth-ranked barrier. This included ethical issues, patient recruitment challenges, and unique characteristics of cardiac arrest.
UNASSIGNED: By identifying cardiac arrest research barriers and suggesting solutions, this study may act as a tool for stakeholders to focus on helping early career researchers overcome these barriers, thus paving the road for future research.
UNASSIGNED: Attendees of the 2022 international masterclass on cardiac arrest registry research accompanied the Global Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry collaborative meeting in Utstein, Norway, and used an adapted hybrid nominal group technique to obtain a diverse and comprehensive perspective. Barriers were identified using a web-based questionnaire and discussed and ranked during an in-person follow-up meeting. After each response was discussed and clarified, barriers were categorized and ranked over two rounds. Each participant scored these from 1 (least significant) to 5 (most significant).
UNASSIGNED: Nine participants generated 36 responses, forming seven overall categories of cardiac arrest research barriers. \"Allocated research time\" was ranked first in both rounds. \"Scientific environment\", including appropriate mentorship and support systems, ranked second in the final ranking. \"Resources\", including funding and infrastructure, ranked third. \"Access to and availability of cardiac arrest research data\" was the fourth-ranked barrier. This included data from the cardiac arrest registries, medical devices, and clinical studies. Finally, \"uniqueness\" was the fifth-ranked barrier. This included ethical issues, patient recruitment challenges, and unique characteristics of cardiac arrest.
UNASSIGNED: By identifying cardiac arrest research barriers and suggesting solutions, this study may act as a tool for stakeholders to focus on helping early career researchers overcome these barriers, thus paving the road for future research.
摘要：
■心脏骤停研究没有像其他主题的研究那样受到科学关注。这里,我们旨在从一个国际早期职业研究小组的角度确定心脏骤停研究障碍.
■2022年心脏骤停登记研究国际大师班的与会者陪同在Utstein举行的全球院外心脏骤停登记合作会议，挪威,并使用适应的混合名义组技术来获得多样化和全面的观点。使用基于网络的问卷确定障碍，并在面对面的后续会议上进行讨论和排名。在讨论和澄清每个回答后，障碍进行了两轮分类和排名。每位参与者从1（最不显著）到5（最显著）得分。
■九位参与者产生了36个回答，形成七大类心脏骤停研究障碍。“分配的研究时间”在两轮中均排名第一。\"科学环境\",包括适当的指导和支持系统，在最终排名中排名第二。\"资源\",包括资金和基础设施，排名第三。“心脏骤停研究数据的获取和可用性”是排名第四的障碍。这包括心脏骤停登记处的数据，医疗器械,和临床研究。最后,“独特性”是排名第五的障碍。这包括道德问题，患者招募挑战，和心脏骤停的独特特征。
■通过确定心脏骤停研究障碍并提出解决方案，这项研究可以作为利益相关者专注于帮助早期职业研究人员克服这些障碍的工具，从而为未来的研究铺平了道路。
■2022年心脏骤停登记研究国际大师班的与会者陪同在Utstein举行的全球院外心脏骤停登记合作会议，挪威,并使用适应的混合名义组技术来获得多样化和全面的观点。使用基于网络的问卷确定障碍，并在面对面的后续会议上进行讨论和排名。在讨论和澄清每个回答后，障碍进行了两轮分类和排名。每位参与者从1（最不显著）到5（最显著）得分。
■九位参与者产生了36个回答，形成七大类心脏骤停研究障碍。“分配的研究时间”在两轮中均排名第一。\"科学环境\",包括适当的指导和支持系统，在最终排名中排名第二。\"资源\",包括资金和基础设施，排名第三。“心脏骤停研究数据的获取和可用性”是排名第四的障碍。这包括心脏骤停登记处的数据，医疗器械,和临床研究。最后,“独特性”是排名第五的障碍。这包括道德问题，患者招募挑战，和心脏骤停的独特特征。
■通过确定心脏骤停研究障碍并提出解决方案，这项研究可以作为利益相关者专注于帮助早期职业研究人员克服这些障碍的工具，从而为未来的研究铺平了道路。
