METHODS: A population PK model describing lefamulin concentrations in plasma, subcutaneous adipose and muscle tissue was developed. For ceftaroline, a similar previously reported PK model was adopted. In vitro time-kill experiments were performed with six MRSA isolates and a PD model was developed to describe bacterial growth and antimicrobial effects. The clinical PK and in vitro PD models were linked to compare antimicrobial effects of ceftaroline and lefamulin at the different target sites.
RESULTS: Considering minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and standard dosages, ceftaroline showed superior anti-MRSA effects compared to lefamulin both at plasma and soft-tissue concentrations. Looking at the individual antibiotics, lefamulin effects were highest at soft-tissue concentrations, while ceftaroline effects were highest at plasma concentrations, emphasising the importance of considering target-site PK-PD in antibiotic treatment optimisation.
CONCLUSIONS: Given standard dosing regimens, ceftaroline appeared more effective than lefamulin against MRSA at soft-tissue concentrations. The PK-PD model-based approach applied in this study could be used to compare or explore the potential of antibiotics for specific indications or in populations with unique target-site PK.
方法:描述血浆中lefamulin浓度的群体PK模型,发展皮下脂肪和肌肉组织。对于头孢洛林,采用了以前报道的类似PK模型.用6种MRSA分离物进行了体外时间杀伤实验,并开发了PD模型来描述细菌生长和抗菌作用。将临床PK和体外PD模型相关联以比较头孢洛林和lefamulin在不同靶位点处的抗微生物作用。
结果:考虑到最小抑制浓度(MIC)分布和标准剂量,在血浆和软组织浓度下,头孢洛林均显示出比lefamulin更好的抗MRSA作用。看看单独的抗生素,lefamulin在软组织浓度下效果最高,虽然头孢洛林在血浆浓度下效果最高,强调在抗生素治疗优化中考虑靶位PK-PD的重要性。
结论:给定标准给药方案,在软组织浓度下,头孢洛林比lefamulin对MRSA更有效。本研究中应用的基于PK-PD模型的方法可用于比较或探索抗生素在特定适应症或具有独特靶位PK的人群中的潜力。