PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Due to the character of the taekwondo, the adenosine triphosphate-phosphocreatine system provides the energy for each kick, the glycolytic system supports the repeated execution of kicks, and the aerobic system promotes recovery between these movements and the bout. Therefore, taekwondo athletes require high explosive power and anaerobic capacity in order to carry out sustained and powerful attacks. So, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of APRE and VBRT on lower-limb explosive power and anaerobic capacity in college taekwondo players.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 taekwondo players completed an 8-week training intervention with autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise (APRE; n = 15) and velocity-based resistance training (VBRT; n = 15). Testing included the one-repetition maximum squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test (TAIKT), and 30-s Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT).
UNASSIGNED: (1) Intragroup comparisons revealed significant effects for one-repetition maximum squat, peak power of CMJ (CMJPP), relative peak power of CMJ (CMJRPP), and total number of TAIKT (TAIKTTN) in both the APRE and VBRT groups. The VBRT group exhibited small effect sizes for time at peak power of WAnT (WAnTPPT) and moderate effect sizes for peak power of WAnT (WAnTPP), relative peak power of WAnT (WAnTRPP), and fatigue index of TAIKT (TAIKTFI), whereas the APRE group exhibited small effect sizes for TAIKTFI. (2) Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant effects in any of the results. However, VBRT demonstrated a moderate advantage in WAnTPP and WAnTRPP, whereas APRE had a small advantage in CMJPP and CMJRPP.
UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that APRE improved explosive power (CMJPP and CMJRPP) more, whereas VBRT improved anaerobic power output (WAnTPP and WAnTRPP) more. Both methods were found to have similar effects in improving the anaerobic endurance (WAnTPPT and TAIKTTN) and fatigue index (power drop of WAnT and TAIKTFI).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 taekwondo players completed an 8-week training intervention with autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise (APRE; n = 15) and velocity-based resistance training (VBRT; n = 15). Testing included the one-repetition maximum squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test (TAIKT), and 30-s Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT).
UNASSIGNED: (1) Intragroup comparisons revealed significant effects for one-repetition maximum squat, peak power of CMJ (CMJPP), relative peak power of CMJ (CMJRPP), and total number of TAIKT (TAIKTTN) in both the APRE and VBRT groups. The VBRT group exhibited small effect sizes for time at peak power of WAnT (WAnTPPT) and moderate effect sizes for peak power of WAnT (WAnTPP), relative peak power of WAnT (WAnTRPP), and fatigue index of TAIKT (TAIKTFI), whereas the APRE group exhibited small effect sizes for TAIKTFI. (2) Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant effects in any of the results. However, VBRT demonstrated a moderate advantage in WAnTPP and WAnTRPP, whereas APRE had a small advantage in CMJPP and CMJRPP.
UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that APRE improved explosive power (CMJPP and CMJRPP) more, whereas VBRT improved anaerobic power output (WAnTPP and WAnTRPP) more. Both methods were found to have similar effects in improving the anaerobic endurance (WAnTPPT and TAIKTTN) and fatigue index (power drop of WAnT and TAIKTFI).
摘要：
■由于跆拳道的特点,三磷酸腺苷-磷酸肌酸系统为每次踢提供能量，糖酵解系统支持重复执行踢腿，有氧系统促进这些运动和回合之间的恢复。因此,跆拳道运动员需要很高的爆发力和无氧能力，才能进行持续有力的攻击。所以,本研究的目的是比较APRE和VBRT对高校跆拳道运动员下肢爆发力和无氧能力的影响。
■共有30名跆拳道运动员完成了为期8周的训练干预，包括自动调节渐进式阻力训练（APRE;n=15）和基于速度的阻力训练（VBRT;n=15）。测试包括一次重复的最大下蹲，反运动跳跃(CMJ),跆拳道无氧间歇踢试验(TAIKT)，和30-sWingate厌氧测试（WAnT）。
■（1）组内比较显示了一次重复最大深蹲的显着影响，CMJ（CMJPP）的峰值功率，CMJ的相对峰值功率(CMJRPP)，APRE和VBRT组的TAIKT总数（TAIKTTN）。VBRT组在WAnT的峰值功率（WAnTPPT）的时间上表现出较小的效应大小，而在WAnT的峰值功率（WAnTPP）上表现出中等的效应大小，WAnT的相对峰值功率（WAnTRPP），和TAIKT的疲劳指数（TAIKTFI），而APRE组对TAIKTFI的效应大小较小。（2）组间比较显示任何结果均无明显影响。然而,VBRT在WAnTPP和WAnTRPP中表现出中等优势，而APRE在CMJPP和CMJRPP中优势较小。
■这些发现表明，APRE提高了爆炸力（CMJPP和CMJRPP），而VBRT提高无氧功率输出(WAnTPP和WAnTRPP)更多。发现两种方法在改善厌氧耐力（WAnTPPT和TAIKTTN）和疲劳指数（WAnT和TAIKTFI的功率下降）方面具有相似的效果。
■共有30名跆拳道运动员完成了为期8周的训练干预，包括自动调节渐进式阻力训练（APRE;n=15）和基于速度的阻力训练（VBRT;n=15）。测试包括一次重复的最大下蹲，反运动跳跃(CMJ),跆拳道无氧间歇踢试验(TAIKT)，和30-sWingate厌氧测试（WAnT）。
■（1）组内比较显示了一次重复最大深蹲的显着影响，CMJ（CMJPP）的峰值功率，CMJ的相对峰值功率(CMJRPP)，APRE和VBRT组的TAIKT总数（TAIKTTN）。VBRT组在WAnT的峰值功率（WAnTPPT）的时间上表现出较小的效应大小，而在WAnT的峰值功率（WAnTPP）上表现出中等的效应大小，WAnT的相对峰值功率（WAnTRPP），和TAIKT的疲劳指数（TAIKTFI），而APRE组对TAIKTFI的效应大小较小。（2）组间比较显示任何结果均无明显影响。然而,VBRT在WAnTPP和WAnTRPP中表现出中等优势，而APRE在CMJPP和CMJRPP中优势较小。
■这些发现表明，APRE提高了爆炸力（CMJPP和CMJRPP），而VBRT提高无氧功率输出(WAnTPP和WAnTRPP)更多。发现两种方法在改善厌氧耐力（WAnTPPT和TAIKTTN）和疲劳指数（WAnT和TAIKTFI的功率下降）方面具有相似的效果。
