We recruited participants from the McGill University Health Centre who provided serum or participant-collected dried blood samples (DBS) at 28-days, 3 months, and 6 months post-second dose and at 28-days after a third dose. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV2 spike (S), the receptor-binding domain (RBD), nucleocapsid (N) and neutralizing antibodies to the ancestral strain were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We examined associations between long (≤89 days) versus short (<89 days) between-dose intervals and antibody response through multivariable mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, prior covid infection status, time since vaccine dose, and assay batch.
The cohort included 328 participants who received up to three vaccine doses (>80% Pfizer-BioNTech). Weighted averages of the serum (n=744) and DBS (n=216) cohort results from the multivariable models showed that IgG anti-S was 31% higher (95% CI: 12% to 53%) and IgG anti-RBD was 37% higher (95% CI: 14% to 65%) in the long vs. short interval participants, across all time points.
Our study indicates that extending the covid primary series between-dose interval beyond 89 days (approximately 3 months) provides stronger antibody responses than intervals less than 89 days. Our demonstration of a more robust antibody response with a longer between dose interval is reassuring as logistical and supply challenges are navigated in low-resource settings.
■我们招募了来自麦吉尔大学健康中心的参与者,他们在28天提供血清或参与者收集的干血样本(DBS),3个月,第二次给药后6个月和第三次给药后28天。抗SARS-CoV2尖峰(S)的IgG抗体,受体结合域(RBD),通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)评估核衣壳(N)和祖先菌株的中和抗体。我们通过根据年龄调整的多变量混合效应模型,检查了剂量间隔之间长(≤89天)与短(<89天)与抗体反应之间的关联。性别,先前的covid感染状态,疫苗剂量以来的时间,和测定批次。
■该队列包括328名参与者,他们接受了多达三剂疫苗(>80%Pfizer-BioNTech)。来自多变量模型的血清(n=744)和DBS(n=216)队列结果的加权平均值显示,IgG抗S高出31%(95%CI:12%至53%),IgG抗RBD高出37%(95%CI:14%至65%)。短间隔参与者,在所有时间点。
■我们的研究表明,将covid主要系列的给药间隔延长到89天(约3个月)以上,与少于89天的间隔相比,提供了更强的抗体反应。由于在低资源环境中对后勤和供应挑战进行了导航,因此我们证明了更强大的抗体反应以及更长的剂量间隔令人放心。