OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the combined diagnostic accuracy of TE and VLS in assessing NAFLD or NASH and compare it with liver biopsy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
METHODS: In a prospective cohort of 70 morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgery, preoperative TE and intraoperative VLS were calculated. Findings of TE and VLS were compared with histology from intraoperative liver biopsy.
RESULTS: Histologically, 44 (62.85%) had NAFLD (≥ S1). Significant steatosis was seen in 20 (28.57%) while significant fibrosis was visible in 18 (25.71%). Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) TE for diagnosis of NAFLD was excellent (0.844, p = 0.001). At the optimal cutoff of 8.1, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.9%, and diagnostic accuracy was 90.6%. VLS had a sensitivity of 90.9% for NAFLD. The combined sensitivity of TE + VLS was 95.5% for ruling out NAFLD. Fourteen (20%) had NASH. VLS had a diagnostic accuracy of 97% in identifying NASH in comparison to TE. AUROC-VLS was 0.987, p ≤ 0.001, and a sensitivity of 100%. The overall sensitivity of combined TE and VLS was 100% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: TE when combined with intraoperative VLS is comparable to liver biopsy and can be used for the diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
目的:评估TE和VLS在评估NAFLD或NASH中的联合诊断准确性,并将其与接受减肥手术的患者的肝活检进行比较。
方法:在接受减肥手术的70例病态肥胖的前瞻性队列中,术前计算TE和术中VLS。将TE和VLS的发现与术中肝活检的组织学进行比较。
结果:组织学,44例(62.85%)患有NAFLD(≥S1)。显著的脂肪变性见于20例(28.57%),而显著的纤维化见于18例(25.71%)。用于诊断NAFLD的接收器工作特性下面积(AUROC)TE非常出色(0.844,p=0.001)。在最佳临界值8.1时,阳性预测值(PPV)为92.9%,诊断准确率为90.6%。VLS对NAFLD的敏感性为90.9%。TE+VLS排除NAFLD的联合敏感性为95.5%。14人(20%)患有NASH。与TE相比,VLS在识别NASH方面的诊断准确性为97%。AUROC-VLS为0.987,p≤0.001,灵敏度为100%。联合TE和VLS的总体敏感性为100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为100%。
结论:TE结合术中VLS与肝活检相当,可用于减肥手术患者NAFLD和NASH的诊断。