PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of using foam roller on pain intensity in individuals with chronic and acute musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: This systematic review was registered in the National Institute for Health Research\'s prospective online registry of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under CRD42023456841. The databases Pubmed, Medline (via Ovid), Embase, BVS, and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) were consulted to carry out this systematic review. Notably, the records of clinical trials characterized as eligible were manually searched. The search terms were: (foam rolling OR foam rolling vibration) AND (acute musculoskeletal pain) AND (chronic musculoskeletal pain). The search was performed until August 22, 2023. For the analysis of the methodological quality, the PEDro scale was used for each of the manuscripts included in the systematic review. Due to the heterogeneity in the studies included in this systematic review, performing a meta-analysis of the analyzed variables was impossible.
RESULTS: Only six manuscripts were eligible for data analysis. The type of FR used was non-vibrational, being applied by a therapist in only one of the manuscripts. With an application time ranging from at least 45 s to 15 min, the non-vibrational FR was applied within a day up to six weeks. Using the PEDro scale, scores were assigned that varied between 4 and 8 points, with an average of 6 ± 1.29 points. Only two randomized clinical trials found a significant benefit in pain intensity of adding FR associated with a therapeutic exercise protocol in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome and chronic neck pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review do not elucidate or reinforce the clinical use of FR in pain intensity in individuals with chronic and acute musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: This systematic review was registered in the National Institute for Health Research\'s prospective online registry of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under CRD42023456841. The databases Pubmed, Medline (via Ovid), Embase, BVS, and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) were consulted to carry out this systematic review. Notably, the records of clinical trials characterized as eligible were manually searched. The search terms were: (foam rolling OR foam rolling vibration) AND (acute musculoskeletal pain) AND (chronic musculoskeletal pain). The search was performed until August 22, 2023. For the analysis of the methodological quality, the PEDro scale was used for each of the manuscripts included in the systematic review. Due to the heterogeneity in the studies included in this systematic review, performing a meta-analysis of the analyzed variables was impossible.
RESULTS: Only six manuscripts were eligible for data analysis. The type of FR used was non-vibrational, being applied by a therapist in only one of the manuscripts. With an application time ranging from at least 45 s to 15 min, the non-vibrational FR was applied within a day up to six weeks. Using the PEDro scale, scores were assigned that varied between 4 and 8 points, with an average of 6 ± 1.29 points. Only two randomized clinical trials found a significant benefit in pain intensity of adding FR associated with a therapeutic exercise protocol in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome and chronic neck pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review do not elucidate or reinforce the clinical use of FR in pain intensity in individuals with chronic and acute musculoskeletal pain.
摘要：
目的：分析泡沫滚筒对慢性和急性肌肉骨骼痛患者疼痛强度的影响。
方法：该系统评价在美国国立卫生研究院的前瞻性在线系统评价注册中心（PROSPERO）CRD42023456841下注册。数据库Pubmed,Medline（通过Ovid），Embase,BVS,和PEDro（物理治疗证据数据库）进行了这项系统评价。值得注意的是,人工检索符合资格的临床试验记录.搜索项为：（泡沫滚动或泡沫滚动振动）和（急性肌肉骨骼疼痛）和（慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛）。搜索一直进行到2023年8月22日。为了分析方法学质量，系统综述中的每份稿件均使用PEDro量表.由于本系统评价中包含的研究的异质性，对所分析的变量进行荟萃分析是不可能的.
结果：只有6份手稿符合数据分析条件。使用的FR类型是非振动的，仅在其中一份手稿中被治疗师应用。应用时间至少从45s到15min，非振动FR在1天内应用,直至6周.用PEDro秤,分数在4到8分之间变化，平均6±1.29分。只有两项随机临床试验发现，在髌股疼痛综合征和慢性颈痛患者中，增加与治疗性运动方案相关的FR对疼痛强度有显著益处。
结论：本系统综述的结果并未阐明或加强FR在慢性和急性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛强度方面的临床应用。
方法：该系统评价在美国国立卫生研究院的前瞻性在线系统评价注册中心（PROSPERO）CRD42023456841下注册。数据库Pubmed,Medline（通过Ovid），Embase,BVS,和PEDro（物理治疗证据数据库）进行了这项系统评价。值得注意的是,人工检索符合资格的临床试验记录.搜索项为：（泡沫滚动或泡沫滚动振动）和（急性肌肉骨骼疼痛）和（慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛）。搜索一直进行到2023年8月22日。为了分析方法学质量，系统综述中的每份稿件均使用PEDro量表.由于本系统评价中包含的研究的异质性，对所分析的变量进行荟萃分析是不可能的.
结果：只有6份手稿符合数据分析条件。使用的FR类型是非振动的，仅在其中一份手稿中被治疗师应用。应用时间至少从45s到15min，非振动FR在1天内应用,直至6周.用PEDro秤,分数在4到8分之间变化，平均6±1.29分。只有两项随机临床试验发现，在髌股疼痛综合征和慢性颈痛患者中，增加与治疗性运动方案相关的FR对疼痛强度有显著益处。
结论：本系统综述的结果并未阐明或加强FR在慢性和急性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛强度方面的临床应用。
