From January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, a thorough retrospective study was carried out to examine and compare the antibiotic susceptibility test outcomes and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with mPA and non-mPA infections.
This study investigated a cohort of 111 patients who were diagnosed with mPA infections, as well as 792 patients diagnosed with non-mPA infections. Significant demographic disparities, including gender (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.043), and hypertension (p < 0.001), are evident between the mPA and non-mPA groups. The mPA group commonly necessitates hospitalization for respiratory system diseases, whereas the non-mPA group is associated with concomitant cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. The mPA group demonstrates lower utilization rates of medical devices, such as Foley catheter (p < 0.001), nasogastric tube (p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), tracheostomy (p < 0.001), arterial and venous catheterization (p < 0.001), and exhibits superior organ function status, including lower incidences of hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.001), septic shock (p < 0.001), liver dysfunction (p < 0.001), renal failure (p < 0.001), and respiratory failure (p < 0.001). The non-mPA group is more vulnerable to infection with two or more bacterial pathogens compared to the mPA group, with the non-mPA group frequently resulting in Enterobacteriaceae infections and the mPA group being associated with fungal infections. Variations in antibiotic sensitivity are noted for Amikacin (p < 0.001), Ciprofloxacin (p < 0.001), Cefepime (p = 0.003), and Levofloxacin (p < 0.001) in antibiotic susceptibility testing, with resistance patterns closely tied to specific antibiotic usage.
There are significant demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations and antibiotic susceptibility between mPA and non-mPA infections. It is crucial to emphasize these characteristics due to their significant role in preventing and treating PA infections.
■从2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日,进行了一项全面的回顾性研究,以检查和比较mPA和非mPA感染的住院患者的抗生素敏感性试验结果和临床特征。
■这项研究调查了111名被诊断为mPA感染的患者,以及792例诊断为非mPA感染的患者。巨大的人口差异,包括性别(p<0.001),年龄(p<0.001),住院时间(p<0.001),糖尿病(p=0.043),和高血压(p<0.001),在mPA和非mPA基团之间是明显的。mPA组通常需要住院治疗呼吸系统疾病,而非mPA组与伴随的心脑血管疾病有关。mPA小组显示医疗设备的利用率较低,如Foley导管(p<0.001),鼻胃管(p<0.001),机械通气(p<0.001),气管造口术(p<0.001),动脉和静脉导管插入术(p<0.001),并表现出优越的器官功能状态,包括低白蛋白血症发生率较低(p<0.001),感染性休克(p<0.001),肝功能障碍(p<0.001),肾功能衰竭(p<0.001),和呼吸衰竭(p<0.001)。与mPA组相比,非mPA组更容易感染两种或两种以上的细菌病原体,非mPA组经常导致肠杆菌感染,而mPA组与真菌感染有关。阿米卡星的抗生素敏感性变化(p<0.001),环丙沙星(p<0.001),头孢吡肟(p=0.003),和左氧氟沙星(p<0.001)在抗生素药敏试验中,耐药模式与特定的抗生素使用密切相关。
■有显著的人口统计学特征,mPA和非mPA感染的临床表现和抗生素敏感性。由于它们在预防和治疗PA感染中的重要作用,强调这些特征是至关重要的。