PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Drowning is a public health problem in Türkiye, as in the rest of the world. This study aims to systematically review the literature on drowning in Türkiye with a focus on data sources, epidemiology, risk factors and prevention strategies.
METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SPORTSDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Turk MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Google Akademik (Turkish language). Studies (limited to original research written in English and Turkish) reporting drowning (unintentional and intentional; fatal and non-fatal) of residents and tourists in Türkiye were independently dual screened at the title and abstract and full text stages. Study quality was assessed using JBI checklists and evidence level assessed based on study design.
RESULTS: From a total of 917 studies, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most (51%) focused on unintentional fatal drowning. Included studies were most commonly analytical cross-sectional studies (n = 23) and case series (n = 20) meaning the evidence level was low or very low for 48 (98%) studies. Fifteen studies examined drowning at the national level, while sub-national studies (n = 30) focused on urban areas across three provinces: Antalya (n = 6), Istanbul (n = 6), Izmir (n = 4). There was little consensus on risk factors beyond male drowning risk, and no data reported on implemented or evaluated drowning prevention interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more national-level studies to identify the causes of drowning and to guide intervention implementation and evaluation to inform policy makers and donors. Currently official data is limited in its detail, providing age and gender data only, hampering efforts to identify, and thus address, causal factors for drowning.
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently very little evidence to inform investment in effective drowning prevention interventions in Türkiye. To improve this, data collection systems on drowning in Türkiye need to be strengthened via the development a national drowning registry.
BACKGROUND: #CRD42022382615.
METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SPORTSDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Turk MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Google Akademik (Turkish language). Studies (limited to original research written in English and Turkish) reporting drowning (unintentional and intentional; fatal and non-fatal) of residents and tourists in Türkiye were independently dual screened at the title and abstract and full text stages. Study quality was assessed using JBI checklists and evidence level assessed based on study design.
RESULTS: From a total of 917 studies, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most (51%) focused on unintentional fatal drowning. Included studies were most commonly analytical cross-sectional studies (n = 23) and case series (n = 20) meaning the evidence level was low or very low for 48 (98%) studies. Fifteen studies examined drowning at the national level, while sub-national studies (n = 30) focused on urban areas across three provinces: Antalya (n = 6), Istanbul (n = 6), Izmir (n = 4). There was little consensus on risk factors beyond male drowning risk, and no data reported on implemented or evaluated drowning prevention interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more national-level studies to identify the causes of drowning and to guide intervention implementation and evaluation to inform policy makers and donors. Currently official data is limited in its detail, providing age and gender data only, hampering efforts to identify, and thus address, causal factors for drowning.
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently very little evidence to inform investment in effective drowning prevention interventions in Türkiye. To improve this, data collection systems on drowning in Türkiye need to be strengthened via the development a national drowning registry.
BACKGROUND: #CRD42022382615.
摘要：
背景：溺水是蒂尔基耶的公共卫生问题，就像世界其他地方一样。本研究旨在系统地回顾有关Türkiye溺水的文献，重点是数据源，流行病学,风险因素和预防策略。
方法：使用PubMed进行文献检索，SPORTSDiscus,Scopus,WebofScience,TurkMEDLINE,谷歌学者和谷歌Akademik（土耳其语）。报告蒂尔基耶居民和游客溺水（无意和故意；致命和非致命）的研究（仅限于以英语和土耳其语撰写的原始研究）在标题，摘要和全文阶段进行了双重筛选。使用JBI检查表评估研究质量，并根据研究设计评估证据水平。
结果：在总共917项研究中，49符合纳入标准。大多数（51％）专注于无意的致命溺水。纳入的研究最常见的是分析性横断面研究（n=23）和病例系列研究（n=20），这意味着48项（98％）研究的证据水平较低或非常低。15项研究在国家一级检查了溺水，次国家研究（n=30）集中在三个省的城市地区：安塔利亚（n=6），伊斯坦布尔（n=6），伊兹密尔(n=4)。对男性溺水风险以外的风险因素几乎没有共识，没有关于实施或评估的溺水预防干预措施的数据报告。
结论：有必要开展更多的国家级研究，以确定溺水的原因，并指导干预措施的实施和评估，以告知政策制定者和捐助者。目前官方数据的细节有限，仅提供年龄和性别数据，阻碍了识别的努力，因此地址，溺水的原因。
结论：目前很少有证据表明在Türkiye进行有效的溺水预防干预措施。为了改善这一点，需要通过开发国家溺水登记册来加强蒂尔基耶溺水的数据收集系统。
背景：#CRD42022382615。
方法：使用PubMed进行文献检索，SPORTSDiscus,Scopus,WebofScience,TurkMEDLINE,谷歌学者和谷歌Akademik（土耳其语）。报告蒂尔基耶居民和游客溺水（无意和故意；致命和非致命）的研究（仅限于以英语和土耳其语撰写的原始研究）在标题，摘要和全文阶段进行了双重筛选。使用JBI检查表评估研究质量，并根据研究设计评估证据水平。
结果：在总共917项研究中，49符合纳入标准。大多数（51％）专注于无意的致命溺水。纳入的研究最常见的是分析性横断面研究（n=23）和病例系列研究（n=20），这意味着48项（98％）研究的证据水平较低或非常低。15项研究在国家一级检查了溺水，次国家研究（n=30）集中在三个省的城市地区：安塔利亚（n=6），伊斯坦布尔（n=6），伊兹密尔(n=4)。对男性溺水风险以外的风险因素几乎没有共识，没有关于实施或评估的溺水预防干预措施的数据报告。
结论：有必要开展更多的国家级研究，以确定溺水的原因，并指导干预措施的实施和评估，以告知政策制定者和捐助者。目前官方数据的细节有限，仅提供年龄和性别数据，阻碍了识别的努力，因此地址，溺水的原因。
结论：目前很少有证据表明在Türkiye进行有效的溺水预防干预措施。为了改善这一点，需要通过开发国家溺水登记册来加强蒂尔基耶溺水的数据收集系统。
背景：#CRD42022382615。
