PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: To develop an international consensus statement to advise on designing, delivering and evaluating sport-based interventions (SBIs) aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison.
METHODS: Modified Delphi using two rounds of survey questionnaires and two consensus workshops.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of more than 40 experts from 15 international jurisdictions was formed, including representation from the following groups and stakeholders: professionals working in the justice system; officials from sport federations and organisations; academics with research experience of prisons, secure forensic mental health settings and SBIs; and policy-makers in criminal justice and sport.
RESULTS: A core research team and advisory board developed the initial rationale, statement and survey. This survey produced qualitative data which was analysed thematically. The findings were presented at an in-person workshop. Panellists discussed the findings, and, using a modified nominal group technique, reached a consensus on objectives to be included in a revised statement. The core research team and advisory board revised the statement and recirculated it with a second survey. Findings from the second survey were discussed at a second, virtual, workshop. The core research team and advisory board further revised the consensus statement and recirculated it asking panellists for further comments. This iterative process resulted in seven final statement items; all participants have confirmed that they agreed with the content, objectives and recommendations of the final statement.
CONCLUSIONS: The statement can be used to assist those that design, deliver and evaluate SBIs by providing guidance on: (1) minimum levels of competence for those designing and delivering SBIs; (2) the design and delivery of inclusive programmes prioritising disadvantaged groups; and (3) evaluation measures which are carefully calibrated both to capture proposed programme outcomes and to advance an understanding of the systems, processes and experiences of sport engagement in prison.
METHODS: Modified Delphi using two rounds of survey questionnaires and two consensus workshops.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of more than 40 experts from 15 international jurisdictions was formed, including representation from the following groups and stakeholders: professionals working in the justice system; officials from sport federations and organisations; academics with research experience of prisons, secure forensic mental health settings and SBIs; and policy-makers in criminal justice and sport.
RESULTS: A core research team and advisory board developed the initial rationale, statement and survey. This survey produced qualitative data which was analysed thematically. The findings were presented at an in-person workshop. Panellists discussed the findings, and, using a modified nominal group technique, reached a consensus on objectives to be included in a revised statement. The core research team and advisory board revised the statement and recirculated it with a second survey. Findings from the second survey were discussed at a second, virtual, workshop. The core research team and advisory board further revised the consensus statement and recirculated it asking panellists for further comments. This iterative process resulted in seven final statement items; all participants have confirmed that they agreed with the content, objectives and recommendations of the final statement.
CONCLUSIONS: The statement can be used to assist those that design, deliver and evaluate SBIs by providing guidance on: (1) minimum levels of competence for those designing and delivering SBIs; (2) the design and delivery of inclusive programmes prioritising disadvantaged groups; and (3) evaluation measures which are carefully calibrated both to capture proposed programme outcomes and to advance an understanding of the systems, processes and experiences of sport engagement in prison.
摘要：
目的：制定国际共识声明，为设计提供建议，提供和评估旨在促进社会，监狱里的心理和身体健康。
方法：使用两轮调查问卷和两个共识研讨会修改了Delphi。
方法：组成了一个由来自15个国际司法管辖区的40多名专家组成的多学科小组，包括以下团体和利益攸关方的代表:司法系统专业人员；体育联合会和组织的官员；具有监狱研究经验的学者，确保法医心理健康环境和SBI；以及刑事司法和体育领域的政策制定者。
结果：核心研究团队和顾问委员会提出了最初的理由，声明和调查。这项调查产生了定性数据，并进行了主题分析。调查结果是在一个面对面的研讨会上介绍的。小组成员讨论了调查结果，and,使用修改的标称组技术，就将纳入修订声明的目标达成共识。核心研究团队和顾问委员会修改了该声明，并通过第二次调查将其重新分发。第二次调查的结果进行了讨论，虚拟,研讨会。核心研究小组和顾问委员会进一步修改了共识声明，并重新分发了该声明，要求小组成员进一步发表意见。这个迭代过程导致了七个最终声明项目；所有参与者都确认他们同意内容，最终声明的目标和建议。
结论：该声明可用于帮助设计，通过提供以下方面的指导来交付和评估SBI：（1）设计和交付SBI的人员的最低能力水平；（2）设计和交付优先考虑弱势群体的包容性计划；（3）仔细校准的评估措施，以获取拟议的计划成果并增进对系统的理解，监狱体育参与的过程和经验。
方法：使用两轮调查问卷和两个共识研讨会修改了Delphi。
方法：组成了一个由来自15个国际司法管辖区的40多名专家组成的多学科小组，包括以下团体和利益攸关方的代表:司法系统专业人员；体育联合会和组织的官员；具有监狱研究经验的学者，确保法医心理健康环境和SBI；以及刑事司法和体育领域的政策制定者。
结果：核心研究团队和顾问委员会提出了最初的理由，声明和调查。这项调查产生了定性数据，并进行了主题分析。调查结果是在一个面对面的研讨会上介绍的。小组成员讨论了调查结果，and,使用修改的标称组技术，就将纳入修订声明的目标达成共识。核心研究团队和顾问委员会修改了该声明，并通过第二次调查将其重新分发。第二次调查的结果进行了讨论，虚拟,研讨会。核心研究小组和顾问委员会进一步修改了共识声明，并重新分发了该声明，要求小组成员进一步发表意见。这个迭代过程导致了七个最终声明项目；所有参与者都确认他们同意内容，最终声明的目标和建议。
结论：该声明可用于帮助设计，通过提供以下方面的指导来交付和评估SBI：（1）设计和交付SBI的人员的最低能力水平；（2）设计和交付优先考虑弱势群体的包容性计划；（3）仔细校准的评估措施，以获取拟议的计划成果并增进对系统的理解，监狱体育参与的过程和经验。
