PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
This paper presents a comprehensive review of publicly available online dyslexia learning modules with a particular focus on the extent to which modules address the prevalent myth that dyslexia is caused by \"backwards reading.\" The authors conducted a systematic internet search to identify publicly available online dyslexia learning modules and coded the content across education, neurocognition, and policy disciplinary domains. We identified 18 topics across a small number (N = 14) of publicly available modules that focused on dyslexia, with only two modules directly addressing this dyslexia myth. While both identified this myth as false, neither provided information about the neurocognitive underpinnings of dyslexia to explain why this myth is false. This review will be useful for guiding further development of online dyslexia learning modules which are urgently needed due to persisting misinformation about this disorder. The coded content reviews of each module will also be beneficial for directing attention to existing resources for professional development on dyslexia.
摘要：
本文对公开的在线阅读障碍学习模块进行了全面的回顾，特别关注模块在多大程度上解决了阅读障碍是由“向后阅读”引起的普遍神话。“作者进行了系统的互联网搜索，以识别公开的在线阅读障碍学习模块，并对整个教育内容进行编码，神经认知，和政策纪律领域。我们在少量（N=14）公开可用的模块中确定了18个主题，这些模块专注于阅读障碍，只有两个模块直接解决这个阅读障碍的神话。虽然两人都认为这个神话是假的，两者都没有提供关于阅读障碍的神经认知基础的信息来解释为什么这个神话是错误的。这篇评论将有助于指导在线阅读障碍学习模块的进一步发展，由于持续存在有关这种障碍的错误信息，这些模块是迫切需要的。每个模块的编码内容评论也将有助于将注意力引导到阅读障碍专业发展的现有资源。
