PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Skin graft involves removing a part of the skin and using it in another part of the body. One of the most common reasons for using a graft is burns. We aimed to compare the effect of Colactive plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze dressing in donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts of burned patients.
UNASSIGNED: The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran\'s formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.
UNASSIGNED: The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.
UNASSIGNED: The present study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the Motahari burn Hospital, Tehran, Iran in 1401. The sampling method was done using Cochran\'s formula and available patients so 15 people were enrolled. The findings of the study were collected using a researcher-made form.
UNASSIGNED: The average duration of recovery, the amount and intensity of pain, and the amount of itching between the two types of Colative plus Ag plus Ag dressing with Vaseline gauze are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (P-value<0.05). In addition, the findings showed that the average amount of scar left by the wound in the two types of dressings examined is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (P-value > 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The use of Colactive silver dressing has less pain, less itching in the donor area, and a shorter average recovery time than Vaseline gauze. The use of the Colactive plus Ag will be more effective than Vaseline gauze.
摘要：
■皮肤移植涉及去除皮肤的一部分并将其用于身体的另一部分。使用移植物的最常见原因之一是烧伤。我们旨在比较Colactive加Ag敷料与凡士林纱布敷料在烧伤患者分层厚度皮肤移植物的供体部位的效果。
■本研究是在Motahari烧伤医院进行的一项随机临床试验（RCT），德黑兰,伊朗1401抽样方法使用Cochran公式和可用的患者进行，因此招募了15人。研究结果是使用研究人员制作的表格收集的。
■恢复的平均持续时间，疼痛的程度和强度，两种Colative+Ag+Ag敷料与凡士林纱布之间的瘙痒量在95％置信水平上具有统计学意义。(P值<0.05)。此外,结果表明，在95%置信水平（P值>0.05）下，两种敷料中伤口留下的平均疤痕量无统计学意义。
■使用合银敷料疼痛较少，在供体区域减少瘙痒，平均恢复时间比凡士林纱布短。使用Colactive加Ag将比凡士林纱布更有效。
■本研究是在Motahari烧伤医院进行的一项随机临床试验（RCT），德黑兰,伊朗1401抽样方法使用Cochran公式和可用的患者进行，因此招募了15人。研究结果是使用研究人员制作的表格收集的。
■恢复的平均持续时间，疼痛的程度和强度，两种Colative+Ag+Ag敷料与凡士林纱布之间的瘙痒量在95％置信水平上具有统计学意义。(P值<0.05)。此外,结果表明，在95%置信水平（P值>0.05）下，两种敷料中伤口留下的平均疤痕量无统计学意义。
■使用合银敷料疼痛较少，在供体区域减少瘙痒，平均恢复时间比凡士林纱布短。使用Colactive加Ag将比凡士林纱布更有效。
