PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The crux of building and planning standards for age-friendly built environment in all countries resides in the regulation of age-friendly built environment practices, yet there exist variations in the representation of content dimensions. The UK is distinguished by its discretionary approach to guidance, whereas China exhibits a highly controlled disposition. Control and guidance may appear to be antithetical, it is essential to recognize that the building and planning standards for age-friendly built environment in both countries never deviate from the legal constraints while providing guidance in achieving age-friendly environments, thus striking a delicate balance between control and guidance. The study examines the standard systems of national standards, local standards and organizational standards, as well as the three dimensions of foundation standards, generic standards and specialized standards. The analysis of building and planning standards for age-friendly built environment in the UK and China scrutinizes the disparities between control and guidance, identifying similarities and differences in the building and planning standard system and content dimensions of the two countries. This analysis serves as a valuable reference for the development of building and planning standards for age-friendly built environment in China.
摘要：
所有国家对年龄友好型建筑环境的建筑和规划标准的关键在于对年龄友好型建筑环境实践的规范，然而，内容维度的表示存在差异。英国的特点是其谨慎的指导方式，而中国表现出高度受控的倾向。控制和引导似乎是对立的，必须认识到，两国对年龄友好的建筑环境的建筑和规划标准在为实现对年龄友好的环境提供指导的同时，从未偏离法律约束，从而在控制和引导之间达成微妙的平衡。研究考察了国家标准的标准体系,地方标准和组织标准，以及地基标准的三个维度，通用标准和专门标准。在英国和中国对年龄友好型建筑环境的建筑和规划标准的分析中，审查了控制和指导之间的差距，确定两国建筑和规划标准体系和内容维度的异同。该分析为中国发展年龄友好型建筑环境的建筑和规划标准提供了有价值的参考。
