Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Auditory-perceptual measurements of voice are among the most common diagnostic tools used during a voice evaluation and are considered a gold standard for documenting voice disorders. The goal of this pilot study was to examine the fidelity of clinicians in the administration of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and its published protocol. This investigation aimed to determine how the CAPE-V is being used by clinicians and researchers and the extent to which users deviate from the published procedure.
METHODS: Survey METHODS: Data were collected by surveying a group (N = l7) of speech-language pathologists who regularly evaluate and treat patients with voice disorders. Survey results revealed that few of the sampled speech-language pathologists follow exactly the standardized instructions for administering the CAPE-V. Considerable variability in CAPE-V administration, including tasks and stimuli examined, was found across respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory project may be used to develop a larger national survey study investigating fidelity to the CAPE-V and to motivate recommendations for possible revisions to the instrument and its protocol for administration.
METHODS: Survey METHODS: Data were collected by surveying a group (N = l7) of speech-language pathologists who regularly evaluate and treat patients with voice disorders. Survey results revealed that few of the sampled speech-language pathologists follow exactly the standardized instructions for administering the CAPE-V. Considerable variability in CAPE-V administration, including tasks and stimuli examined, was found across respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory project may be used to develop a larger national survey study investigating fidelity to the CAPE-V and to motivate recommendations for possible revisions to the instrument and its protocol for administration.
摘要：
目的：语音的听觉感知测量是语音评估过程中最常用的诊断工具之一，被认为是记录语音障碍的金标准。这项初步研究的目的是检查临床医生在语音共识听觉感知评估（CAPE-V）及其已发布协议的管理中的保真度。这项调查旨在确定临床医生和研究人员如何使用CAPE-V，以及用户偏离已发布程序的程度。
方法：调查方法：通过调查一组（N=17）定期评估和治疗嗓音障碍患者的言语-语言病理学家来收集数据。调查结果显示，很少有抽样的语言病理学家完全遵循CAPE-V管理的标准化说明。CAPE-V给药的差异很大，包括检查的任务和刺激，在受访者中发现。
结论：该探索性项目可用于开发更大的国家调查研究，调查CAPE-V的保真度，并激发对仪器及其给药方案的可能修订的建议。
方法：调查方法：通过调查一组（N=17）定期评估和治疗嗓音障碍患者的言语-语言病理学家来收集数据。调查结果显示，很少有抽样的语言病理学家完全遵循CAPE-V管理的标准化说明。CAPE-V给药的差异很大，包括检查的任务和刺激，在受访者中发现。
结论：该探索性项目可用于开发更大的国家调查研究，调查CAPE-V的保真度，并激发对仪器及其给药方案的可能修订的建议。
