PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
The goal of this work was to use the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) diagnostic method to find out the existing and preferred organizational culture in companies in the Czech Republic and then to evaluate their dependence on the size of the organizations. Data were collected in 2019-2021 and evaluated using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS 24 statistical program, e.g., descriptive statistics tools, one-sample z-test, analysis of variance and post hoc test (Tukey\'s honest significant difference - HSD). The research was conducted on a sample of 962 companies across the entire republic and fields. The results of the study show that clan culture prevails in the Czech Republic, which was dominant in all six dimensions. Enterprises in the Czech Republic have a mix of organizational cultures in the following order: (1) clan culture (31.72%), (2) hierarchical culture (25.46%), (3) market culture (21.5%), and (4) adhocratic culture (21.28%). However, with regard to the desired cultural mix, this order changes as follows: (1) clan (35.3%), (2) hierarchical (22.91%), (3) adhocratic (22.63%), and (4) market culture (19.17%). Furthermore, it was found that a statistically significant difference was observed in the assessment of organizational culture depending on the size of the organization in the Czech Republic. A limitation of the research could be the unequal number of respondents in 2020 and 2021, which does not allow comparing differences in the time period. This work can serve as a comparative basis of organizational culture with another national culture.
摘要：
这项工作的目标是使用组织文化评估工具（OCAI）诊断方法来找出捷克共和国公司中现有和首选的组织文化，然后评估其对组织规模的依赖。数据收集于2019-2021年，并使用MicrosoftExcel和IBMSPSS24统计程序进行评估，例如，描述性统计工具，单样本z检验，方差分析和事后检验(Tukey的诚实显著性差异-HSD)。这项研究是对整个共和国和各个领域的962家公司进行的。研究结果表明，捷克共和国的氏族文化盛行，在所有六个维度中占主导地位。捷克共和国的企业按以下顺序混合了组织文化：（1）氏族文化（31.72％），(2)等级文化(25.46%),（3）市场文化（21.5%），（4）教化文化（21.28%）。然而,关于所需的文化组合，这一顺序变化如下:(1)宗族(35.3%)，（2）分层（22.91%），（3）好教（22.63%），和（4）市场文化（19.17%）。此外，发现根据捷克共和国组织的规模，在组织文化评估中观察到统计学上的显着差异。这项研究的局限性可能是2020年和2021年的受访者人数不相等，这不允许比较时间段的差异。这项工作可以作为组织文化与另一种民族文化的比较基础。
