PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Blueprint provides a base for assessment by assigning proportionate weightage to various content areas and helps the paper setter to construct a uniform and valid assessment. This study aimed to design and validate a blueprint for theory in Community Medicine as per the new curriculum for Medical Undergraduates in India.
UNASSIGNED: Blueprint in community medicine was designed by assigning impact score (I) and frequency score (F) for the competencies. Blueprint was validated using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and inter-rater agreement for subject experts using Fleiss\' kappa statistics was calculated. Feedback from faculty and students was obtained afterward to assess the postimplementation response.
UNASSIGNED: Blueprint was designed by an expert group where impact score and frequency score were assigned to 146 competencies in the theory of Community Medicine. In Delphi survey I, 63.2% of subject experts responded, while in Delphi survey II, a response rate of 58.3% was achieved. Value of the Fleiss\' Kappa test for an inter-rater agreement was 0.68, i.e. \"substantial agreement,\" while CVI among the raters came out to be 0.86, i.e. overall valid assessment. Feedback of faculty (n = 11) suggested that the blueprint was helpful and standardized the paper setting, whereas feedback from students (n = 138) depicted that it helped in preparing for exams, and they would recommend it to other students.
UNASSIGNED: Validated blueprint by consensus of subject experts has impact score and frequency score along with topic-wise distribution of marks for the convenience of faculty and its utility is well proven among learners too.
UNASSIGNED: Blueprint in community medicine was designed by assigning impact score (I) and frequency score (F) for the competencies. Blueprint was validated using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and inter-rater agreement for subject experts using Fleiss\' kappa statistics was calculated. Feedback from faculty and students was obtained afterward to assess the postimplementation response.
UNASSIGNED: Blueprint was designed by an expert group where impact score and frequency score were assigned to 146 competencies in the theory of Community Medicine. In Delphi survey I, 63.2% of subject experts responded, while in Delphi survey II, a response rate of 58.3% was achieved. Value of the Fleiss\' Kappa test for an inter-rater agreement was 0.68, i.e. \"substantial agreement,\" while CVI among the raters came out to be 0.86, i.e. overall valid assessment. Feedback of faculty (n = 11) suggested that the blueprint was helpful and standardized the paper setting, whereas feedback from students (n = 138) depicted that it helped in preparing for exams, and they would recommend it to other students.
UNASSIGNED: Validated blueprint by consensus of subject experts has impact score and frequency score along with topic-wise distribution of marks for the convenience of faculty and its utility is well proven among learners too.
摘要：
■蓝图通过为各个内容区域分配成比例的权重，为评估提供了基础，并帮助纸张制定者构建了统一而有效的评估。本研究旨在根据印度医学本科生的新课程设计和验证社区医学理论蓝图。
■社区医学蓝图是通过为能力分配影响得分（I）和频率得分（F）来设计的。使用内容有效性指数(CVI)验证蓝图，并计算了使用Fleiss\'kappa统计数据的主题专家的评估者之间的协议。随后获得了教师和学生的反馈，以评估充血后的反应。
■蓝图是由一个专家组设计的，其中影响得分和频率得分被分配给社区医学理论中的146个能力。在Delphi调查I中,63.2%的主题专家回答,而在德尔福调查II中，有效率为58.3%。评估者之间协议的Fleiss\'Kappa测试的价值为0.68，即\“实质性协议，“而评估者中的CVI为0.86，即总体有效评估。教师的反馈(n=11)表明蓝图是有帮助的，并标准化了论文设置，而来自学生的反馈(n=138)描述了它有助于准备考试，他们会推荐给其他学生。
■经过学科专家共识验证的蓝图具有影响分数和频率分数以及按主题分配的分数，以方便教师，其效用也在学习者中得到了很好的证明。
■社区医学蓝图是通过为能力分配影响得分（I）和频率得分（F）来设计的。使用内容有效性指数(CVI)验证蓝图，并计算了使用Fleiss\'kappa统计数据的主题专家的评估者之间的协议。随后获得了教师和学生的反馈，以评估充血后的反应。
■蓝图是由一个专家组设计的，其中影响得分和频率得分被分配给社区医学理论中的146个能力。在Delphi调查I中,63.2%的主题专家回答,而在德尔福调查II中，有效率为58.3%。评估者之间协议的Fleiss\'Kappa测试的价值为0.68，即\“实质性协议，“而评估者中的CVI为0.86，即总体有效评估。教师的反馈(n=11)表明蓝图是有帮助的，并标准化了论文设置，而来自学生的反馈(n=138)描述了它有助于准备考试，他们会推荐给其他学生。
■经过学科专家共识验证的蓝图具有影响分数和频率分数以及按主题分配的分数，以方便教师，其效用也在学习者中得到了很好的证明。
