PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of internal and external focus attention instructions on learning the tennis groundstroke (forehand-backhand drive) for children.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 60 (30 girls, 30 boys) children aged 10.24 ± 0.48 years were included in the study. Children were randomly divided into three groups: External Focused Group (EFG), Internal Focused Group (IFG), and Control Group (CG).
UNASSIGNED: In the pre-training tests of tennis skill (TST) and tennis transfer (TTT), there was no significant difference between the three groups (EFG, IFG, and CG) according to one-way ANOVA results (p > 0.05). Significant interaction was determined between groups and measurements in a repeated-measures ANOVA analysis (three groups, three measurements) and TST and TTT (p < 0.01). According to the post-hoc analysis, it was determined that the TST results increased significantly in the EFG compared to the IFG and CG, and there was no significant difference in the TTT between the EFG and IFG, but both groups showed significant improvements compared to the CG.
UNASSIGNED: Instructions to children to focus attention externally facilitate learning the groundstroke (forehand-backhand) technique, which is one of the basic tennis techniques.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 60 (30 girls, 30 boys) children aged 10.24 ± 0.48 years were included in the study. Children were randomly divided into three groups: External Focused Group (EFG), Internal Focused Group (IFG), and Control Group (CG).
UNASSIGNED: In the pre-training tests of tennis skill (TST) and tennis transfer (TTT), there was no significant difference between the three groups (EFG, IFG, and CG) according to one-way ANOVA results (p > 0.05). Significant interaction was determined between groups and measurements in a repeated-measures ANOVA analysis (three groups, three measurements) and TST and TTT (p < 0.01). According to the post-hoc analysis, it was determined that the TST results increased significantly in the EFG compared to the IFG and CG, and there was no significant difference in the TTT between the EFG and IFG, but both groups showed significant improvements compared to the CG.
UNASSIGNED: Instructions to children to focus attention externally facilitate learning the groundstroke (forehand-backhand) technique, which is one of the basic tennis techniques.
摘要：
■这项研究的目的是检查内部和外部焦点注意力指示对儿童学习网球击打（正手反手驱动）的影响。
■总共60个（30个女孩，30名男孩）年龄为10.24±0.48岁的儿童被纳入研究。儿童被随机分为三组：外部聚焦组（EFG），内部焦点小组(IFG)，对照组（CG）。
■在网球技能（TST）和网球转移（TTT）的训练前测试中，三组之间无显著差异(EFG，IFG,和CG)根据单因素方差分析结果(p>0.05)。在重复测量ANOVA分析中确定了组间和测量值之间的显着相互作用（三组，三次测量)以及TST和TTT(p<0.01)。根据事后分析，确定与IFG和CG相比，EFG的TST结果显着增加，EFG和IFG之间的TTT没有显着差异，但与CG相比，两组均显示出显着改善。
■指导孩子从外部集中注意力，促进学习打地（正手反手）技术，这是网球的基本技术之一。
■总共60个（30个女孩，30名男孩）年龄为10.24±0.48岁的儿童被纳入研究。儿童被随机分为三组：外部聚焦组（EFG），内部焦点小组(IFG)，对照组（CG）。
■在网球技能（TST）和网球转移（TTT）的训练前测试中，三组之间无显著差异(EFG，IFG,和CG)根据单因素方差分析结果(p>0.05)。在重复测量ANOVA分析中确定了组间和测量值之间的显着相互作用（三组，三次测量)以及TST和TTT(p<0.01)。根据事后分析，确定与IFG和CG相比，EFG的TST结果显着增加，EFG和IFG之间的TTT没有显着差异，但与CG相比，两组均显示出显着改善。
■指导孩子从外部集中注意力，促进学习打地（正手反手）技术，这是网球的基本技术之一。
