UNASSIGNED: A pilot randomized trial assessed the impact of addition of the PCPR to a standard pathology report on knowledge accuracy, decisional self-efficacy and control, and therapeutic alliance.
UNASSIGNED: 55 participants were enrolled; 20 participants in the intervention group and 24 controls completed follow-up. There was no significant difference in polyp knowledge between groups at baseline or 30-days, with similar confidence in understanding their diagnoses, decisional self-efficacy, and therapeutic alliance. Most participants receiving a PCPR felt that it helped them understand their diagnosis better and should always be provided with the standard pathology report.
UNASSIGNED: Although patient attitudes toward the PCPR were positive, receiving it did not significantly improve knowledge accuracy or measures of self-efficacy. Further iterations should be explored to communicate key knowledge about colorectal polyp results.
UNASSIGNED: A stakeholder-driven approach to PCPR development facilitated construction of a personalized document that has potential to increase patient\'s understanding for their results and needed follow-up.
■一项随机试验评估了在标准病理学报告中加入PCCPR对知识准确性的影响,决策自我效能感和控制,和治疗联盟。
■55名参与者入组;干预组20名参与者和24名对照组完成随访。在基线或30天,组间息肉知识没有显着差异,以同样的信心理解他们的诊断,决策自我效能感,和治疗联盟。大多数接受PCCPR的参与者认为,这有助于他们更好地理解他们的诊断,并应始终提供标准的病理报告。
■尽管患者对PCCPR的态度是积极的,接受它并没有显着提高知识准确性或自我效能感的测量。应探索进一步的迭代以传达有关结直肠息肉结果的关键知识。
■利益相关者驱动的PCPR开发方法促进了个性化文件的构建,该文件有可能增加患者对其结果和需要的后续行动的理解。