METHODS: A total of 235 participants (265 FLLs; the study group) were enrolled to undergo abdominal examinations, which included data acquisition from B-mode, SWE, and raw radiofrequency data for TSI construction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate performance. A dataset of 20 patients (20 FLLs; the validation group) was additionally acquired to further evaluate the efficacy of the TSI cutoff value in FLL characterization.
RESULTS: In the study group, our findings revealed that while SWE achieved a success rate of 49.43 % in FLL measurements, TSI boasted a success rate of 100 %. In cases where SWE was effectively implemented, the AUROCs for characterizing FLLs using SWE and TSI stood at 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. For instances where SWE imaging failed, TSI achieved an AUROC of 0.78. Considering all cases, TSI presented an overall AUROC of 0.81. There was no statistically significant difference in AUROC values between TSI and SWE (p > 0.05). In the validation group, using a TSI cutoff value of 0.67, the AUROC for characterizing FLLs was 0.80.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ultrasound TSI holds promise as a supplementary diagnostic tool to SWE for characterizing FLLs.
方法:共纳入235名参与者(265名FLL;研究组)进行腹部检查,其中包括来自B模式的数据采集,SWE,和TSI建设的原始射频数据。接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)用于评估性能。另外获得20名患者(20个FLL;验证组)的数据集以进一步评估TSI截断值在FLL表征中的功效。
结果:在研究组中,我们的研究结果表明,虽然SWE在FLL测量中取得了49.43%的成功率,TSI的成功率为100%。在有效实施SWE的情况下,使用SWE和TSI表征FLL的AUROC分别为0.84和0.83。对于SWE成像失败的实例,TSI获得0.78的AUROC。考虑到所有情况,TSI呈现0.81的总体AUROC。TSI和SWE之间的AUROC值无统计学差异(p>0.05)。在验证组中,使用0.67的TSI截止值,表征FLL的AUROC为0.80.
结论:结论:超声TSI有望作为SWE表征FLL的补充诊断工具。