PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to translate the Awareness of Rights Scale into Chinese and test its psychometric properties among nursing students in clinical practice.
METHODS: The original English scale was translated, synthesized, and back-translated according to the Brislin translation model: the translated scale was cross-culturally adapted through expert correspondence and pretesting to form the Chinese version of the scale; a convenience sampling method was used to survey 486 nursing interns in Liaoning, Guangdong, and Anhui regions to assess the reliability and validity of the scale.
RESULTS: The Chinese version of the scale consists of 14 items in three dimensions. The Cronbach\'s alpha value of the scale was 0.916 and the range of Cronbach\'s alpha coefficients of subscale was 0.768 to 0.894. The discounted half reliability was 0.867 and the retest reliability was 0.901. The scale content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.963. A total of three common factors were extracted for the exploratory factor analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis indices fit well (χ2/df = 1.092, RMSEA = 0.014, CFI = 0.998, IFI = 0.998. TLI = 0.997), and the model fit was good.
CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the scale has good reliability and validity in the nursing intern population and can be used to assess nursing interns\' awareness of their rights in clinical practice in mainland China.
METHODS: The original English scale was translated, synthesized, and back-translated according to the Brislin translation model: the translated scale was cross-culturally adapted through expert correspondence and pretesting to form the Chinese version of the scale; a convenience sampling method was used to survey 486 nursing interns in Liaoning, Guangdong, and Anhui regions to assess the reliability and validity of the scale.
RESULTS: The Chinese version of the scale consists of 14 items in three dimensions. The Cronbach\'s alpha value of the scale was 0.916 and the range of Cronbach\'s alpha coefficients of subscale was 0.768 to 0.894. The discounted half reliability was 0.867 and the retest reliability was 0.901. The scale content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.963. A total of three common factors were extracted for the exploratory factor analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis indices fit well (χ2/df = 1.092, RMSEA = 0.014, CFI = 0.998, IFI = 0.998. TLI = 0.997), and the model fit was good.
CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the scale has good reliability and validity in the nursing intern population and can be used to assess nursing interns\' awareness of their rights in clinical practice in mainland China.
摘要：
目的：这项研究的目的是将权利意识量表翻译成中文，并在临床实践中测试其在护理专业学生中的心理测量特性。
方法：翻译原来的英文量表，合成，并根据Brislin翻译模式进行回译:通过专家函授和预测试,对翻译量表进行跨文化改编,形成中文版量表;采用便利抽样法对辽宁486名护理实习生进行调查,广东,和安徽地区对量表进行信度和效度评估。
结果：量表的中文版由三个维度的14个项目组成。量表的Cronbachα值为0.916，子量表的Cronbachα系数范围为0.768至0.894。折后的半可靠性为0.867，重测可靠性为0.901。量表含量效度指数(S-CVI)为0.963。共提取三个公因子进行探索性因子分析。验证性因子分析指标拟合良好(χ2/df=1.092,RMSEA=0.014,CFI=0.998,FI=0.998。TLI=0.997),模型拟合很好。
结论：中文版量表在护理实习生人群中具有良好的信度和效度，可用于评估中国大陆护理实习生在临床实践中的权利意识。
方法：翻译原来的英文量表，合成，并根据Brislin翻译模式进行回译:通过专家函授和预测试,对翻译量表进行跨文化改编,形成中文版量表;采用便利抽样法对辽宁486名护理实习生进行调查,广东,和安徽地区对量表进行信度和效度评估。
结果：量表的中文版由三个维度的14个项目组成。量表的Cronbachα值为0.916，子量表的Cronbachα系数范围为0.768至0.894。折后的半可靠性为0.867，重测可靠性为0.901。量表含量效度指数(S-CVI)为0.963。共提取三个公因子进行探索性因子分析。验证性因子分析指标拟合良好(χ2/df=1.092,RMSEA=0.014,CFI=0.998,FI=0.998。TLI=0.997),模型拟合很好。
结论：中文版量表在护理实习生人群中具有良好的信度和效度，可用于评估中国大陆护理实习生在临床实践中的权利意识。
