PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: This paper discusses a paradox in mental health. It manifests as a relationship between adverse \"bad\" effects (suffering, clinical costs, loss of productivity) in individuals and populations and advantageous \"good\" aspects of mental disorders. These beneficial aspects (scientific, artistic and political accomplishments) emanate at the societal level through the frequently unprecedented creativity of people suffering from mental disorders and their relatives. Such gains can contribute to societal innovation and problem-solving. Especially in times of accelerated social-ecological change, approaches are needed that facilitate best-possible mental health care but also recognize creative ideas conducive to beneficial clinical and social-ecological innovations as soon as possible.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper emphasizes the need to account for creativity as a crucial component in evolving mental health systems and societies. It highlights the need for wide-ranging approaches and discusses how research targeting multiple facets (e.g., brain level, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry, neurology, socio-cultural, economic and other factors) might further our understanding of the creativity-mental disorder link and its importance for innovating mental health systems and societies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our discussion clarifies that considerable research will be needed to obtain a better understanding of how creativity associated with mental disorders may help to create more sustainable societies on a fast-changing planet through innovative ideas. Given the current-state-of-the-art of research and healthcare management, our discussion is currently speculative. However, it provides a basis for how pros and cons might be studied in the future through transdisciplinary research and collaborations across sectors of society.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper emphasizes the need to account for creativity as a crucial component in evolving mental health systems and societies. It highlights the need for wide-ranging approaches and discusses how research targeting multiple facets (e.g., brain level, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry, neurology, socio-cultural, economic and other factors) might further our understanding of the creativity-mental disorder link and its importance for innovating mental health systems and societies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our discussion clarifies that considerable research will be needed to obtain a better understanding of how creativity associated with mental disorders may help to create more sustainable societies on a fast-changing planet through innovative ideas. Given the current-state-of-the-art of research and healthcare management, our discussion is currently speculative. However, it provides a basis for how pros and cons might be studied in the future through transdisciplinary research and collaborations across sectors of society.
摘要：
背景：本文讨论了心理健康中的一个悖论。它表现为不利的“坏”影响(痛苦，临床费用,生产力的丧失)在个人和人群中以及精神障碍的有利“好”方面。这些有益的方面(科学，艺术和政治成就）通过患有精神障碍的人们及其亲戚的空前创造力在社会层面上产生。这样的收获可以促进社会创新和解决问题。特别是在社会生态变化加速的时代，需要采取各种方法来促进最佳的精神卫生保健，但也需要尽快认识到有利于有益的临床和社会生态创新的创造性想法。
结论：本文强调需要将创造力作为不断发展的精神卫生系统和社会的重要组成部分。它强调了对广泛方法的需求，并讨论了针对多个方面的研究如何(例如，大脑水平，认知神经科学,精神病学,神经学,社会文化,经济和其他因素）可能会进一步加深我们对创造力与精神障碍的联系及其对创新精神卫生系统和社会的重要性的理解。
结论：我们的讨论表明，需要进行大量的研究，以更好地了解与精神障碍相关的创造力如何通过创新思想帮助在瞬息万变的星球上创建更可持续的社会。鉴于目前最先进的研究和医疗保健管理，我们的讨论目前是推测性的。然而,它为未来如何通过跨学科研究和社会各界的合作来研究利弊提供了基础。
结论：本文强调需要将创造力作为不断发展的精神卫生系统和社会的重要组成部分。它强调了对广泛方法的需求，并讨论了针对多个方面的研究如何(例如，大脑水平，认知神经科学,精神病学,神经学,社会文化,经济和其他因素）可能会进一步加深我们对创造力与精神障碍的联系及其对创新精神卫生系统和社会的重要性的理解。
结论：我们的讨论表明，需要进行大量的研究，以更好地了解与精神障碍相关的创造力如何通过创新思想帮助在瞬息万变的星球上创建更可持续的社会。鉴于目前最先进的研究和医疗保健管理，我们的讨论目前是推测性的。然而,它为未来如何通过跨学科研究和社会各界的合作来研究利弊提供了基础。
