Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: A prerequisite for successful rehabilitation is that the rehabilitees are in central role of the rehabilitation process. However, the rehabilitees and rehabilitation professionals may both lack knowledge and understanding of how to implement rehabilitee-centered participation in practice. This study aimed to explore the qualitatively different ways of understanding rehabilitee participation as conceptualized by the rehabilitees.
UNASSIGNED: We generated data from individual interviews with 20 rehabilitees after a six-month rehabilitation process. These interviews were analyzed based on phenomenographic methodology.
UNASSIGNED: We identified three understandings of rehabilitee participation as conceptualized by the participants: 1) Dependent participation; 2) Progressive participation; and 3) Committed participation. These categories varied according to four themes: 1) Rehabilitation process; 2) Rehabilitation in everyday life; 3) Interaction in rehabilitation; and 4) Rehabilitation support network. We also identified critical aspects highlighting differences between the qualitatively distinct categories.
UNASSIGNED: This study generated new insights into understanding the phenomenon of rehabilitee participation, as conceptualized by rehabilitees themselves. The findings in terms of three descriptive categories and critical aspects between the categories, reflect the ascending and shifting complexity from dependent to progressive and committed participation. These findings as such can be utilized in the design, development, and implementation of rehabilitee participation and rehabilitee-centered practice.
UNASSIGNED: We generated data from individual interviews with 20 rehabilitees after a six-month rehabilitation process. These interviews were analyzed based on phenomenographic methodology.
UNASSIGNED: We identified three understandings of rehabilitee participation as conceptualized by the participants: 1) Dependent participation; 2) Progressive participation; and 3) Committed participation. These categories varied according to four themes: 1) Rehabilitation process; 2) Rehabilitation in everyday life; 3) Interaction in rehabilitation; and 4) Rehabilitation support network. We also identified critical aspects highlighting differences between the qualitatively distinct categories.
UNASSIGNED: This study generated new insights into understanding the phenomenon of rehabilitee participation, as conceptualized by rehabilitees themselves. The findings in terms of three descriptive categories and critical aspects between the categories, reflect the ascending and shifting complexity from dependent to progressive and committed participation. These findings as such can be utilized in the design, development, and implementation of rehabilitee participation and rehabilitee-centered practice.
摘要：
■成功康复的先决条件是康复者在康复过程中起着核心作用。然而,康复者和康复专业人员可能都缺乏如何在实践中实施以康复者为中心的参与的知识和理解。本研究旨在探索康复者概念化的理解康复者参与的定性不同方式。
■我们在经过6个月的康复过程后，对20名康复者进行了个人访谈，获得了数据。这些访谈是基于现象学方法进行分析的。
■我们确定了参与者对康复者参与的三种理解：1）依赖性参与；2）渐进参与；3）承诺参与。这些类别根据四个主题而有所不同：1）康复过程；2）日常生活中的康复；3）康复中的互动；4）康复支持网络。我们还确定了关键方面，突出了定性不同类别之间的差异。
■这项研究为理解康复者参与现象提供了新的见解，由康复者自己概念化。三个描述性类别和类别之间的关键方面的调查结果，反映了从依赖到进步和承诺参与的上升和转变的复杂性。这些发现可以在设计中使用，发展,实施康复者参与和以康复者为中心的实践。
■我们在经过6个月的康复过程后，对20名康复者进行了个人访谈，获得了数据。这些访谈是基于现象学方法进行分析的。
■我们确定了参与者对康复者参与的三种理解：1）依赖性参与；2）渐进参与；3）承诺参与。这些类别根据四个主题而有所不同：1）康复过程；2）日常生活中的康复；3）康复中的互动；4）康复支持网络。我们还确定了关键方面，突出了定性不同类别之间的差异。
■这项研究为理解康复者参与现象提供了新的见解，由康复者自己概念化。三个描述性类别和类别之间的关键方面的调查结果，反映了从依赖到进步和承诺参与的上升和转变的复杂性。这些发现可以在设计中使用，发展,实施康复者参与和以康复者为中心的实践。
