METHODS: Systematic review and metasummary of qualitative empirical research.
METHODS: The literature search targeted studies concerning the professional care interactions between nursing personnel and the informal caregivers of people with progressive memory disorders. The search in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus covered records from the earliest possible date up to December 2020. The data were summarised using a qualitative metasummary method. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used to validate the reporting process.
RESULTS: Ten articles were included. As presented in 33 statements, the factors affecting the quality of interactions were related to (1) expectations, (2) memory disorders, (3) interaction strategies, (4) time and place of interactions and (5) organisational aspects. Meeting the individual interactional needs of informal caregivers is recommended. The results provide guidance for improving the quality of interactions between nursing personnel and informal caregivers.
方法:定性实证研究的系统回顾和转移。
方法:文献检索针对进行性记忆障碍患者的护理人员与非正式护理人员之间的专业护理互动研究。PubMed中的搜索,CINAHL,PsycINFO和Scopus涵盖了从最早的日期到2020年12月的记录。使用定性定量方法对数据进行汇总。使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)清单的首选报告项目来验证报告过程。
结果:包括10篇文章。如33项声明所述,影响交互质量的因素与(1)期望,(2)记忆障碍,(3)互动策略,(4)互动的时间和地点;(5)组织方面。建议满足非正式护理人员的个人互动需求。研究结果为提高护理人员与非正式护理人员的互动质量提供指导。