This was a nested case-control study of Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy who were screened for PE at 11-13 weeks\' gestation as part of a non-intervention study between December 2016 and June 2018. GlyFn levels were measured retrospectively in archived serum from 1685 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and from 448 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using a point-of-care (POC) device. Concordance between ELISA and POC tests was assessed using Lin\'s correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses. GlyFn was transformed into multiples of the median (MoM) to adjust for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. GlyFn MoM was compared between PE and non-PE pregnancies, and the association between GlyFn MoM and gestational age at delivery with PE was assessed. Risk for developing PE was estimated using the FMF competing-risks model. Screening performance for preterm and any-onset PE using different biomarker combinations was quantified by area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rate (DR) at a 10% fixed false-positive rate (FPR). Differences in AUC between biomarker combinations were compared using the DeLong test.
The concordance correlation coefficient between ELISA and POC measurements was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.88). Passing-Bablok analysis indicated proportional bias (slope, 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.14)), with POC GlyFn being significantly higher compared with ELISA GlyFn. ELISA GlyFn in non-PE pregnancies was independent of gestational age at screening (P = 0.11), but significantly dependent on maternal age (P < 0.003), weight (P < 0.0002), height (P = 0.001), parity (P < 0.02) and smoking status (P = 0.002). Compared with non-PE pregnancies, median GlyFn MoM using ELISA and POC testing was elevated significantly in those with preterm PE (1.23 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.18 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively) and those with term PE (1.26 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.22 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively). GlyFn MoM was not correlated with gestational age at delivery with PE (P = 0.989). Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test for preterm PE increased significantly the AUC from 0.859 to 0.896 (P = 0.012) and increased the DR at 10% FPR from 64.9% (95% CI, 48.7-81.1%) to 82.9% (95% CI, 66.4-93.4%). The corresponding DRs at 10% FPR for any-onset PE were 52.5% (95% CI, 42.3-62.5%) and 65.4% (95% CI, 55.2-74.5%), respectively.
Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test increased the screening sensitivity for both preterm and any-onset PE in an Asian population. Prospective non-intervention studies are needed to confirm these initial findings. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
方法:这是一项巢式病例对照研究,在2016年12月至2018年6月进行的一项非干预性研究中,使用中国单胎妊娠女性的血清,最初在11-13周时筛查PE。在1792例妊娠中对血清GlyFn水平进行了回顾性测量,包括112与PE,使用LumellaTM酶联免疫测定法(ELISA),在448例妊娠中,包括112与PE,使用LumellaTM定点护理(POC)装置。使用Lins相关性和Passing-Bablok(PB)分析评估ELISA和POC测量水平之间的一致性。将GlyFn转化为预期中位数(MoM)的倍数以调整母体和妊娠特征。评估了PE和非PE妊娠中的GlyFnMoM以及GlyFnMoM与PE分娩时的胎龄之间的关联。使用FMF竞争风险模型估计PE的风险。筛选性能,根据受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和检出率(DR)以10%的固定假阳性率(FPR)测定早产PE和任何发作PE.使用Delong检验比较不同生物标志物组合之间的AUC差异(AAUC)。
结果:ELSIA和POC测量之间的一致性相关性为0.86(95%置信区间[CI]:0.83-0.88)。PB分析显示比例偏差(斜率=1.08;95CI:1.04-1.14),POCGlyFn显著高于ELISA。非PE妊娠中的GlyFn水平与筛查时的孕龄无关(p>0.11),但与母亲年龄(p<0.003)显着相关。体重(p<0.0002),身高(p=0.001),奇偶校验(p<0.02),吸烟状况(p=0.002)。与非PE妊娠相比,平均ELISA和POCGlyFnMoM水平在早产PE(分别为1.23vs1.00;p<0.0001和1.18vs1.00;p<0.0001)和足月PE(分别为1.26vs1.00;p<0.0001和1.221.00;p<0.0001)妊娠中显著增加。GlyFnMoM与分娩时的胎龄没有显着相关(p=0.989)。在FMF三联试验中添加GlyFn进行早产PE筛查,可将AUC从0.859显着增加到0.896(ΔAUC=0.037;p=0.012),并将DR从64.86%(95CI:48.65%-81.08%)增加到82.86%(95CI:66.35%-93.44%)对于10%的FPR。在同一个FPR,当通过添加GlyFn筛查任何起病PE时,DR从52.48%(95CI:42.30%-62.51%)增加到65.35%(95CI:55.23%-74.54%)。
结论:在亚洲人群中,添加GlyFn可以提高FMF三联试验对早产和任何发作性PE的筛查敏感性。需要前瞻性的非干预性研究来证实我们的初步发现。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。