Abstract:
Political doctrines determine the formation of territorial units or geopolitical models more adequate to generate public value in subnational organizations, with positive results in the HDI, productivity indicators and national competitiveness oriented to improve the quality of public service for citizens who participate in democratic electoral processes with identity and that promote a decentralized State that does not generate development obstacles as an effect of geographical limits by departments and regional governments with inequalities in natural resources and comparative advantages, but that projects integration, better economic performance, sustainability, and sustainability for regional and national development and as an alternative to achieve political stability in Peru. The aim of this article is to explore whether the contribution of natural regions and macro-regions to sustainable development is unequal. Information from official web pages. The disparity index, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey\'s analysis were used. The GDP per capita of the coastal departments is 64% higher than that of the Andes and 136% higher than those of the Amazon; the HDI of the coast exceeds those regions by 31 and 19%; 44% of the urban population residing in marginal neighborhoods are on the coast, 67% in the Andes and 69% in the Amazon. The percentage of corruption is highest on the coast, followed by the Amazon. At the regional macro level, the primacy in GDP per capita and the HDI moves to the south, although the superiority of the corruption index persists in the center, followed by the south; both significantly higher than the east and north. This fact would reveal the possibility of a regional macro development without Lima and through axes of various development nodes, feasible in the era of globalization.
摘要:
政治学说确定了更足以在国家以下组织中产生公共价值的领土单位或地缘政治模式的形成,随着人类发展指数的积极结果,生产率指标和国家竞争力,旨在提高参与民主选举进程的公民的公共服务质量,并促进一个权力下放的国家,该国家不会因部门和地区政府在自然资源和比较优势方面存在不平等的地理限制而产生发展障碍,但是项目整合,更好的经济表现,可持续性和国家发展的可持续性,并作为实现秘鲁政治稳定的替代办法。本文旨在探讨自然区域和宏观区域对可持续发展的贡献是否不平等。来自官方网页的信息。视差指数,采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey分析。沿海地区的人均GDP比安第斯山脉高64%,比亚马逊河高136%;沿海地区的HDI分别超过这些地区31%和19%;居住在边缘社区的城市人口中有44%在沿海地区,安第斯山脉占67%,亚马逊地区占69%。沿海的腐败比例最高,其次是亚马逊。在区域宏观层面,人均GDP和人类发展指数的首要地位向南方转移,尽管腐败指数的优势仍然存在于中心,其次是南部;两者都明显高于东部和北部。这一事实将揭示没有利马,通过各种发展节点的轴线进行区域宏观发展的可能性,在全球化时代是可行的。