METHODS: Cross-sectional national survey of people with ME/CFS using the AQoL-8D and EQ-5D-5L. Additional questions from the AQoL-8D were used as \'bolt-ons\' to the EQ-5D-5L (i.e., EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial). Disability and fatigue severity were assessed using the De Paul Symptom Questionnaire-Short Form (DSQ-SF). HSUs were generated using Australian tariffs. Mean HSUs were stratified for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the three HSU instruments.
RESULTS: For the 198 participants, mean HSUs (95% confidence intervals) were EQ-5D-5L: 0.46 (0.42-0.50); AQoL-8D: 0.43 (0.41-0.45); EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial: 0.44 (0.42-0.46). HSUs were substantially lower than population norms: EQ-5D-5L: 0.89; AQoL-8D: 0.77. As disability and fatigue severity increased, HSUs decreased in all three instruments. Bland-Altman plots revealed interchangeability between the AQoL-8D and EQ-5D-5LPsychosocial. Floor and ceiling effects of 13.5% and 2.5% respectively were observed for the EQ-5D-5L instrument only.
CONCLUSIONS: ME/CFS has a profound impact on HRQoL. The AQoL-8D and EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial can be used interchangeably: the latter represents a reduced participant burden.
方法:使用AQoL-8D和EQ-5D-5L对ME/CFS患者进行全国横断面调查。来自AQoL-8D的其他问题被用作EQ-5D-5L的“螺栓”(即,EQ-5D-5L-心理社会)。使用DePaul症状问卷简表(DSQ-SF)评估残疾和疲劳严重程度。HSU是使用澳大利亚关税生成的。平均HSU根据社会人口统计学和临床因素进行分层。Bland-Altman地块用于比较三种HSU仪器。
结果:对于198名参与者,平均HSUs(95%置信区间)为EQ-5D-5L:0.46(0.42-0.50);AQoL-8D:0.43(0.41-0.45);EQ-5D-5L-社会心理:0.44(0.42-0.46).HSU大大低于人口标准:EQ-5D-5L:0.89;AQoL-8D:0.77。随着残疾和疲劳严重程度的增加,所有三种仪器的HSU均下降。Bland-Altman地块揭示了AQoL-8D和EQ-5D-5LPsychosocial之间的互换性。仅在EQ-5D-5L仪器中观察到分别为13.5%和2.5%的地板和天花板效应。
结论:ME/CFS对HRQoL有深远的影响。AQoL-8D和EQ-5D-5L-社会心理可以互换使用:后者代表参与者负担的减轻。