METHODS: Data extracted from the publications meeting the selection. The outcome parameters included mean pre- and post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere and cylinder of refraction and complications. Available data analyzed with Cochrane Review Manager.
RESULTS: A total of 23 studies including 464 eyes were included. All the parameters showed significant improvement in all subgroups other than CDVA in ACPIOL + CXL subgroup and cylinder in PIOL + CXL subgroups. There was not a significant difference between PCPIOL and ACPIOL in the outcomes, exception was more improvement of CDVA in \"ACPIOL only\" than\" PCPIOL only\" subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PCPIOLs and ACPIOLs are comparably safe and efficient options in management of KCN and their efficacy significantly improves when combined with CXL/ICRS.
方法:从符合选择的出版物中提取的数据。结果参数包括平均术前和术后未矫正视力,矫正视力(CDVA),球面和柱面的折射和并发症。使用CochraneReviewManager分析可用数据。
结果:共纳入23项研究,包括464只眼。除ACPIOLCXL亚组的CDVA和PIOLCXL亚组的圆柱体外,所有参数均显示出显着改善。PCPIOL和ACPIOL在结果上没有显著差异,例外是“仅ACPIOL”亚组的CDVA比“仅PCPIOL”亚组的CDVA改善更多。
结论:PCPIOL和ACPIOL都是治疗KCN的相对安全和有效的选择,当与CXL/ICRS联合使用时,它们的疗效显着提高。