Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the current state of physician leadership. Theory of expert leadership (TEL) was applied to explore the effects of physician inherent knowledge, industry experience and leadership capabilities on leader behaviors and outcomes.
METHODS: This review (August 2011-February 2022) applied the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis strategy. Our search began with 3,537 studies and a final sample of 12 articles.
RESULTS: The findings offer a number of studies that note the relationship between physician leadership and the three dimensions of TEL. How influential these are on leadership behaviors and health-related outcomes varies. We also found a number of studies that described general physician leadership behaviors that were not directly linked to factors of TEL, as well as two additional themes: leader identity and trust.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors\' knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has applied a highly cited theory (i.e. TEL) to the data and the first that has focused solely on a U.S. population. These findings offer healthcare organizations insight into the potential strengths and challenges of physician leadership.
METHODS: This review (August 2011-February 2022) applied the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis strategy. Our search began with 3,537 studies and a final sample of 12 articles.
RESULTS: The findings offer a number of studies that note the relationship between physician leadership and the three dimensions of TEL. How influential these are on leadership behaviors and health-related outcomes varies. We also found a number of studies that described general physician leadership behaviors that were not directly linked to factors of TEL, as well as two additional themes: leader identity and trust.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors\' knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has applied a highly cited theory (i.e. TEL) to the data and the first that has focused solely on a U.S. population. These findings offer healthcare organizations insight into the potential strengths and challenges of physician leadership.
摘要：
目的：本文的目的是对医生领导的现状进行系统的综述。专家领导理论(TEL)被用来探索医生固有知识的影响，行业经验和领导能力对领导者行为和结果的影响。
方法：本综述（2011年8月至2022年2月）采用了系统评价和荟萃分析策略的首选报告项目。我们的搜索始于3,537项研究和12篇文章的最终样本。
结果：这些发现提供了许多研究，这些研究指出了医师领导力与TEL三个维度之间的关系。这些对领导行为和健康相关结果的影响各不相同。我们还发现了许多描述普通医生领导行为的研究，这些行为与TEL的因素没有直接联系，以及两个额外的主题：领导者身份和信任。
结论：据作者所知，这是首次将高引用理论(即TEL)应用于数据的系统综述,也是首次仅针对美国人群的系统综述.这些发现为医疗保健组织提供了对医生领导的潜在优势和挑战的见解。
方法：本综述（2011年8月至2022年2月）采用了系统评价和荟萃分析策略的首选报告项目。我们的搜索始于3,537项研究和12篇文章的最终样本。
结果：这些发现提供了许多研究，这些研究指出了医师领导力与TEL三个维度之间的关系。这些对领导行为和健康相关结果的影响各不相同。我们还发现了许多描述普通医生领导行为的研究，这些行为与TEL的因素没有直接联系，以及两个额外的主题：领导者身份和信任。
结论：据作者所知，这是首次将高引用理论(即TEL)应用于数据的系统综述,也是首次仅针对美国人群的系统综述.这些发现为医疗保健组织提供了对医生领导的潜在优势和挑战的见解。
