PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Effective and rapid actions are required to achieve global goals for climate change mitigation, and there is an opportunity to ensure that the actions taken are also positive for human health. However, little is known about the relative magnitude of the health co-benefits that can be achieved from mitigation actions, so robust and comprehensive syntheses of the evidence on the nature and effects of relevant actions are required. This paper presents a protocol for an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral umbrella review of systematic reviews, synthesising modelled and empirical evidence on such actions.
METHODS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched, capturing literature across a wide range of disciplines and sectors. Unique records retrieved by the searches will be screened by two independent reviewers. The quality of all the included systematic reviews will be assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 critical appraisal tool. Data will be extracted on methodological and thematic characteristics of the reviews, nature of the actions, and their effects on greenhouse gas emission reduction, health, and its determinants, as well as any other reported effects and interactions across different actions.
RESULTS: Narrative and quantitative synthesis methods will be used to create a typology of relevant actions, map pathways to their impacts on health, compare the magnitude of health and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction impacts by selected characteristics of the actions and the nature of the evidence, as well as to identify gaps in evidence syntheses.
CONCLUSIONS: This review will identify the most effective actions for global climate change mitigation and health based on the best available scientific evidence. This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO, Reg No.: CRD42021239292.
METHODS: Nine bibliographic databases will be searched, capturing literature across a wide range of disciplines and sectors. Unique records retrieved by the searches will be screened by two independent reviewers. The quality of all the included systematic reviews will be assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 critical appraisal tool. Data will be extracted on methodological and thematic characteristics of the reviews, nature of the actions, and their effects on greenhouse gas emission reduction, health, and its determinants, as well as any other reported effects and interactions across different actions.
RESULTS: Narrative and quantitative synthesis methods will be used to create a typology of relevant actions, map pathways to their impacts on health, compare the magnitude of health and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction impacts by selected characteristics of the actions and the nature of the evidence, as well as to identify gaps in evidence syntheses.
CONCLUSIONS: This review will identify the most effective actions for global climate change mitigation and health based on the best available scientific evidence. This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO, Reg No.: CRD42021239292.
摘要：
背景：要实现缓解气候变化的全球目标，需要采取有效而迅速的行动，并且有机会确保所采取的行动也对人类健康有利。然而,关于缓解行动可以实现的健康共同效益的相对大小知之甚少，因此，需要对有关行动的性质和影响的证据进行强有力和全面的综合。本文提出了一个跨学科和跨部门的系统综述综述的协议，综合这些行动的模型和经验证据。
方法：将搜索9个书目数据库，捕捉广泛学科和部门的文献。由搜索检索的唯一记录将由两个独立的审阅者筛选。所有包含的系统评价的质量将使用评估系统评价工具（AMSTAR）2关键评估工具进行评估。将提取有关审查方法和主题特征的数据，行为的性质，以及它们对温室气体减排的影响，健康,及其决定因素，以及任何其他报告的不同行动的影响和相互作用。
结果：将使用叙事和定量综合方法来创建相关动作的类型学，绘制它们对健康影响的路径，根据行动的选定特征和证据的性质，比较健康和温室气体(GHG)减排影响的程度，以及找出证据综合中的差距。
结论：本综述将根据现有的最佳科学证据，确定全球气候变化缓解和健康方面最有效的行动。这个协议已经在PROSPERO注册了,注册编号.：CRD42021239292。
方法：将搜索9个书目数据库，捕捉广泛学科和部门的文献。由搜索检索的唯一记录将由两个独立的审阅者筛选。所有包含的系统评价的质量将使用评估系统评价工具（AMSTAR）2关键评估工具进行评估。将提取有关审查方法和主题特征的数据，行为的性质，以及它们对温室气体减排的影响，健康,及其决定因素，以及任何其他报告的不同行动的影响和相互作用。
结果：将使用叙事和定量综合方法来创建相关动作的类型学，绘制它们对健康影响的路径，根据行动的选定特征和证据的性质，比较健康和温室气体(GHG)减排影响的程度，以及找出证据综合中的差距。
结论：本综述将根据现有的最佳科学证据，确定全球气候变化缓解和健康方面最有效的行动。这个协议已经在PROSPERO注册了,注册编号.：CRD42021239292。
