Abstract：
To evaluate the support from the available guidance on reporting of health equity in research for our candidate items and to identify additional items for the Strengthening Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology-Equity extension.
We conducted a scoping review by searching Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Methodology Register, LILACS, and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information up to January 2022. We also searched reference lists and gray literature for additional resources. We included guidance and assessments (hereafter termed \"resources\") related to conduct and/or reporting for any type of health research with or about people experiencing health inequity.
We included 34 resources, which supported one or more candidate items or contributed to new items about health equity reporting in observational research. Each candidate item was supported by a median of six (range: 1-15) resources. In addition, 12 resources suggested 13 new items, such as \"report the background of investigators\".
Existing resources for reporting health equity in observational studies aligned with our interim checklist of candidate items. We also identified additional items that will be considered in the development of a consensus-based and evidence-based guideline for reporting health equity in observational studies.
We conducted a scoping review by searching Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Methodology Register, LILACS, and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information up to January 2022. We also searched reference lists and gray literature for additional resources. We included guidance and assessments (hereafter termed \"resources\") related to conduct and/or reporting for any type of health research with or about people experiencing health inequity.
We included 34 resources, which supported one or more candidate items or contributed to new items about health equity reporting in observational research. Each candidate item was supported by a median of six (range: 1-15) resources. In addition, 12 resources suggested 13 new items, such as \"report the background of investigators\".
Existing resources for reporting health equity in observational studies aligned with our interim checklist of candidate items. We also identified additional items that will be considered in the development of a consensus-based and evidence-based guideline for reporting health equity in observational studies.
摘要：
目的：评估现有指南对我们候选项目研究中健康公平性报告的支持，并确定STROBE（加强流行病学观察性研究报告）-公平性扩展的其他项目。
方法：我们通过搜索Embase进行了范围审查，MEDLINE,CINAHL,Cochrane方法论登记册，LILACS,以及截至2022年1月的加勒比健康科学信息中心。我们还搜索了参考列表和灰色文献以获取更多资源。我们包括指导和评估（以下称为“资源”）与任何类型的健康研究的行为和/或报告有关的人经历健康不平等。
结果：我们包含了34个资源，在观察性研究中支持一个或多个候选项目或促成了有关健康公平性报告的新项目。每个候选项目由六个（范围：1-15）资源的中位数支持。此外,12个资源建议13个新项目，如“报告调查人员的背景”。
结论：在观察性研究中报告健康公平性的现有资源与我们的临时候选项目清单一致。我们还确定了在制定基于共识和证据的指南时将考虑的其他项目，以报告观察性研究中的健康公平性。
方法：我们通过搜索Embase进行了范围审查，MEDLINE,CINAHL,Cochrane方法论登记册，LILACS,以及截至2022年1月的加勒比健康科学信息中心。我们还搜索了参考列表和灰色文献以获取更多资源。我们包括指导和评估（以下称为“资源”）与任何类型的健康研究的行为和/或报告有关的人经历健康不平等。
结果：我们包含了34个资源，在观察性研究中支持一个或多个候选项目或促成了有关健康公平性报告的新项目。每个候选项目由六个（范围：1-15）资源的中位数支持。此外,12个资源建议13个新项目，如“报告调查人员的背景”。
结论：在观察性研究中报告健康公平性的现有资源与我们的临时候选项目清单一致。我们还确定了在制定基于共识和证据的指南时将考虑的其他项目，以报告观察性研究中的健康公平性。
