PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
In this paper, we discuss the use of multi-criteria analysis for investment alternatives as a rational, transparent, and systematic approach that reveals the decision-making process during a study of influences and relationships in complex organizational systems. It is shown that this approach considers not only quantitative but also qualitative influences, statistical and individual properties of the object, and expert objective evaluation. We define the criteria for evaluating startup investment prerogatives, which are organized in thematic clusters (types of potential). To compare the investment alternatives, Saaty\'s hierarchy method is used. As an example, the analysis of three startups is carried out based on the phase mechanism and Saaty\'s analytic hierarchy process to identify investment appeal of startups according to their specific features. As a result, it is possible to diversify the risks of an investor through the allocation of resources between several projects, in accordance with the received vector of global priorities.
摘要：
在本文中,我们讨论了将多准则分析用于投资选择的合理性，透明,和系统的方法，揭示了在复杂组织系统中的影响和关系研究过程中的决策过程。结果表明，这种方法不仅考虑了定量的影响，而且考虑了定性的影响，对象的统计和个体属性，和专家客观评价。我们定义了评估创业投资特权的标准，按专题组(潜力类型)组织。为了比较投资选择，使用Saaty的层次结构方法。作为一个例子,基于阶段机理和Saaty的层次分析法对3家创业公司进行分析,根据创业公司的具体特点识别其投资吸引力。因此,可以通过在多个项目之间分配资源来分散投资者的风险，根据收到的全球优先事项矢量。
